Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-12
review-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-12-tsvart-lc-trammell-2020-12-18-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-12
Requested revision 12 (document currently at 20)
Type Last Call Review
Team Transport Area Review Team (tsvart)
Deadline 2021-01-17
Requested 2020-12-09
Requested by Jeff Tantsura
Authors Ahmed Bashandy , Clarence Filsfils , Prodosh Mohapatra
I-D last updated 2020-12-18
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Bruno Decraene (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -12 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -12 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -12 by Ines Robles (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -12 by Bruno Decraene (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -12 by Brian Trammell (diff)
Comments
The chairs are about to start WGLC and appreciate your reviews and comments.
Assignment Reviewer Brian Trammell
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic by Transport Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/Qri-2CsiPGNxV4hgqt38rotqTgw
Reviewed revision 12 (document currently at 20)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-12-18
review-ietf-rtgwg-bgp-pic-12-tsvart-lc-trammell-2020-12-18-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

Assuming the routing aspects of it are sound, this document is ready from a
transport standpoint.

This informational document describes an approach to speeding BGP convergence
utilizing multiple next-hops; if widely deployed, it would lead to an increased
prevalence of ECMP on interdomain paths during this convergence. It therefore
trades off more transport-visible reordering for faster convergence time.
However, given the prevalence of ECMP routing inside networks, transport
protocols must already tolerate this reordering, so the marginal impact on
transport of this proposal is minimal.