Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rum-rue-09

Request Review of draft-ietf-rum-rue
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2021-11-12
Requested 2021-10-12
Authors Brian Rosen
I-D last updated 2021-11-10
Completed reviews Artart Last Call review of -09 by Rich Salz (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Matt Joras (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Russ Mundy (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -09 by Dr. Bernard D. Aboba (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Rich Salz
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rum-rue by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-11-10
I am the requested ARTART reviewer for this document.

My primary knowledge of SIP comes from hoping and waiting for STIR/SHAKEN to be
adopted. It really needs SIP experts to do a close review.

I read the document.  It is like a conformance document, full of normative
language about which RFC's MUST be implemented, and which parameters in them
SHOULD have specific values.  I cannot comment on whether the sum total of all
requirements makes sense or not.

The document is well-written. The problem space is well-described. Each
individual obligation (MUST MAY SHOULD etc) is in enough detail to make it