Early Review of draft-ietf-scim-device-model-05
review-ietf-scim-device-model-05-iotdir-early-livingood-2024-07-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-scim-device-model-05 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | 05 (document currently at 18) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Internet of Things Directorate (iotdir) | |
| Deadline | 2024-07-12 | |
| Requested | 2024-06-17 | |
| Requested by | Nancy Cam-Winget | |
| Authors | Muhammad Shahzad , Hassan Iqbal , Eliot Lear | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-01 (Latest revision 2025-09-03) | |
| Completed reviews |
Iotdir Early review of -05
by Jason Livingood
(diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Mike Ounsworth (diff) Genart IETF Last Call review of -15 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) |
|
| Comments |
We'd like to get an early directorate review to ensure we are on the right path |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jason Livingood |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-scim-device-model by Internet of Things Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iot-directorate/t2i9ELUa_g-8Q_75RPdX-BbtzGk | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 18) | |
| Result | On the right track | |
| Completed | 2024-07-09 |
review-ietf-scim-device-model-05-iotdir-early-livingood-2024-07-09-00
I reviewed the -05 version. Seems on the right track. - Sec 1.1 does a very good job of briefly explaining why this is needed vs YANG and other seeming alternatives. Good to make the clear case for this so well at the start. Don't be tempted to make this section longer. ;-) - Sec 3.1, s/attribute is not required, and is not case-sensitive/attribute is NOT required, and is NOT case-sensitive - Spell out the BLE acronym on first use (I noticed in Sec 7.1 but BLE may be mentioned earlier) Overall this draft is very mature - surprisingly so - good work so far!