Early Review of draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-17
review-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-17-secdir-early-smith-2024-07-03-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 23) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-07-12 | |
Requested | 2024-03-21 | |
Requested by | Joel M. Halpern | |
Authors | Weiqiang Cheng , Clarence Filsfils , Zhenbin Li , Bruno Decraene , Francois Clad | |
I-D last updated | 2024-07-03 | |
Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -17
by Benson Muite
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -16 by Nicolai Leymann (diff) Opsdir Early review of -16 by Gyan Mishra (diff) Secdir Early review of -17 by Ned Smith (diff) Genart Last Call review of -19 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -19 by Ned Smith (diff) |
|
Comments |
This draft is in working group last call, with a small number of issues still being discussed. The content is alrgely stable, so review at this stage would be helpful. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Ned Smith |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/8dR12_kv-PGF5MxWOVUubOvw5k8 | |
Reviewed revision | 17 (document currently at 23) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-07-03 |
review-ietf-spring-srv6-srh-compression-17-secdir-early-smith-2024-07-03-00
The I-D is ready but the authors may consider making the following changes: Section 4, 5th paragraph: It would be helpful to describe which operational issues / challenges are made easier and why to give guidance on when it may/may not be appropriate to take the recommendation. Section 5.3, second paragraph: S/Therefore/Therefore,/ third paragraph: S/is able to/can/ and S/Therefore/Therefore,/ fourth paragraph: S/GIB,/GIB;/ Section 6.2, first paragraph: S/in order to/to/ Section 6.3, second paragraph: S/instead/instead,/ Section 9.2, seventh paragraph: S/is able to/can/ Section 9.3, third paragraph: S/in particular is/is/ Section 10, third paragraph: S/Draft, and/Draft and/ Section 10.13, first paragraph: S/open source/open-source/ Section 10.13, second paragraph: S/open source/open-source/ I did not attempt to verify the content of the appendix A was correct / sound. I assume the reference implementations are there to achieve this goal despite the stated goal of the reference implementations was for interoperability. Possibly, the authors could comment on how the I-D describes a correct and scalable, as well as interoperable solution.