IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent-10
review-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent-10-artart-lc-thomson-2025-11-06-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-11-11 | |
| Requested | 2025-10-21 | |
| Authors | Damien Miller | |
| I-D last updated | 2026-03-03 (Latest revision 2026-02-19) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart Early review of -07
by Martin Thomson
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Corey Bonnell (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Martin Thomson (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -12 by Duane Wessels (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Martin Thomson |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/w8Z7oRJjRHVL5saZQeSf2V6r_yU | |
| Reviewed revision | 10 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-11-06 |
review-ietf-sshm-ssh-agent-10-artart-lc-thomson-2025-11-06-00
I looked at the diffs between what I last reviewed and -10. The draft has improved. My only observation is that when a reviewer asks questions that the draft doesn't matter, it is often best to answer those questions *in the draft* rather than just in email. There were a couple of questions I asked that would benefit from that. I'd suggest that the authors look at doing that.