Last Call Review of draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-06
review-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-06-artart-lc-mahoney-2024-11-19-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2024-11-19 | |
| Requested | 2024-11-05 | |
| Authors | Jon Peterson , Chris Wendt | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-05-08 (Latest revision 2024-10-21) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -06
by Jean Mahoney
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Valery Smyslov Genart IETF Last Call review of -06 by Elwyn B. Davies Opsdir Telechat review of -06 by Ron Bonica |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jean Mahoney |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/WQFNswdoz-LEDuSVXJ0e2GiQuzI | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2024-11-19 |
review-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update-06-artart-lc-mahoney-2024-11-19-00
This document is ready from an ART perspective as it just updates the SIP Identity header field. Minor issues: idnits calls out RFC 3375 as a downref. The I-D's short title is "RFC4916 Update"; however, there is no mention of updating RFC 4916 in the document or in the document metadata. Is this intentional? Nits: I picked some nits (comma fixes, consistent use of "header field", etc. See https://github.com/ajeanmahoney/draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update/pull/2/files) and also converted the XML to v3. These updates can be found here if you would like to use them: https://github.com/ajeanmahoney/draft-ietf-stir-rfc4916-update Thanks! Jean