Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03
review-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03-genart-lc-sparks-2017-06-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2017-07-13
Requested 2017-06-29
Authors Daniele Ceccarelli , Lou Berger
I-D last updated 2017-06-30
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -02 by Thomas H. Clausen (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -03 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -03 by Robert Sparks (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Qin Wu (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Robert Sparks
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2017-06-30
review-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03-genart-lc-sparks-2017-06-30-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-teas-gmpls-scsi-03
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date: 2017-06-30
IETF LC End Date: 2017-07-13
IESG Telechat date: 2017-08-03

Summary: Ready with nits

I think this document wins the humorous autocorrect-generated (I hope) typo of
the week. See the last sentence of the second paragraph of the IANA
considerations. I suspect you want a different final word.

I also expect IANA will send the decision for which of the options for placing
the registry you suggest back to the group. You would save time by just making
the decision now. Ask IANA now if you want their opinion on how the choice
should go.