Last Call Review of draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-06
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-06-genart-lc-davies-2016-06-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-06-10 | |
| Requested | 2016-05-27 | |
| Authors | Fatai Zhang , Oscar Gonzalez de Dios , Matt Hartley , Zafar Ali , Cyril Margaria | |
| Draft last updated | 2016-06-03 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -02
by
Elwyn B. Davies
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -06 by Elwyn B. Davies (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Paul E. Hoffman (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Niclas Comstedt (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -04 by Niclas Comstedt (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Elwyn B. Davies |
| State | Completed | |
| Review |
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-06-genart-lc-davies-2016-06-03
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-06-03 |
review-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-06-genart-lc-davies-2016-06-03-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>
.
Document:
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect-06.txt
Reviewer:
Elwyn Davies
Review Date:
2016/06/03
IETF LC End Date:
2016/06/10
IESG Telechat date: 2016/06/16
Summary:
Ready. This version contains some minor editorial updates from
-04 which addressed all my comments during the previous last
call. Thanks for addressing the rather more substantial comments
on -02. There are a couple of trivial nits noted below.
Major issues:
None
Minor issues:
None
Nits/editorial comments:
s4.2, Length field: It should be noted that the length is encoded as
an unsigned binary integer.
s4.2, Reserved field: For consistency with the SRLG ID field
description, the (duplicate) size of the field should be removed.
Thus in the description:
s/This 15-bit field/This field/