Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-24

Request Review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 26)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-03-05
Requested 2024-02-20
Authors Douglas Arnold , Heiko Gerstung
I-D last updated 2024-03-04
Completed reviews Intdir Telechat review of -26 by Tommy Pauly
Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -24 by Susan Hares (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -24 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Susan Hares
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 24 (document currently at 26)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-03-04
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-enterprise-profile-??
Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review Date: 2024-03-04
IETF LC End Date: 2024-03-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: I want to thank the authors for carefully adjusting the technical
document to the new terms.

Major issues: none

Minor issues: none

Nits/editorial comments:  English language editorial nits.

Nit #1: in Section 6, last paragraph, sentence five beginning with "Security

old text:/
Security problems include on-path attacks such as
delay attacks, packet interception / manipulation attacks.

New text:
Security problems include on-path attacks such as
delay attacks, packet interception, or manipulation attacks.

#Nit2 in Section 8, paragraph 3, sentence 1

Old text:/In PTP Networks that contain Transparent Clocks, time Transmitters
might receive Delay messages that no longer contains the IP
Addresses of Time Receivers./

change /contains/ to /contain/ - for agreement of plural subject to plural verb.

#Nit 3, section 8, paragraph 3, sentence 2, incorrect spelling

Wo "becuase" should be "because".