Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03
review-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03-genart-lc-haddad-2016-02-12-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-02-11 | |
| Requested | 2016-01-29 | |
| Authors | Paal-Erik Martinsen , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Dan Wing , Varun Singh | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-02-12 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Wassim Haddad
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Watson Ladd (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Lionel Morand (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Wassim Haddad |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-02-12 |
review-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03-genart-lc-haddad-2016-02-12-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq> Document: draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03 Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review Date: 11 February 2016 IETF LC End Date: 11 February 2016 IETF Telechat Date: unknown Summary: This draft is ready for publication as proposed RFC - Major Issues: None - Minor Issues: None Question: Would it make sense to highlight the mobility case (since the document explicitly mentions 3G, 4G, WiFi) in which case, applying the described mechanism would suggest to the mobile to use a different interface after attaching to a different network… Regards, Wassim H.