Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07
review-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07-genart-lc-dupont-2014-12-31-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-12-24
Requested 2014-12-11
Draft last updated 2014-12-31
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Francis Dupont (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Tom Taylor (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -09 by BenoƮt Claise
Assignment Reviewer Francis Dupont
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07-genart-lc-dupont-2014-12-31
Reviewed rev. 07 (document currently at 09)
Review result Ready
Review completed: 2014-12-31

Review
review-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07-genart-lc-dupont-2014-12-31

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-sctp-dtls-encaps-07.txt
Reviewer: Francis Dupont
Review Date: 20141224
IETF LC End Date: 20141224
IESG Telechat date: unknown

Summary: Ready

Major issues: None

Minor issues: None

Nits/editorial comments:
 5 page 4: in "its lower layer should provide this"
  the term "should" is ambiguous, i.e., either it is a keyword
  and SHOULD is better, or it is not and a different word should be used.
  Note I don't know the authors' intention so the best solution.

Regards

Francis.Dupont at fdupont.fr