Last Call Review of draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09
review-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09-genart-lc-krishnan-2014-10-29-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2014-10-27 | |
Requested | 2014-10-16 | |
Authors | Marc Blanchet | |
I-D last updated | 2014-10-29 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -09
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Almost ready | |
Completed | 2014-10-29 |
review-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09-genart-lc-krishnan-2014-10-29-00
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-weirds-bootstrap-09.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/10/28 IESG Telechat date: 2013/10/30 Summary: The document is almost ready for publication as Proposed Standard, but I do have a comment you may wish to consider. * Sections 5.2 and 5.3 -> The document uses some non-documentation addresses (AFAIK) in some of the examples. e.g. 28.2.0.0/16 for an IPv4 prefix and 2600::/16 for an IPv6 prefix. Is it possible to rewrite these examples using reserved documentation addresses? Strangely enough, idnits does not seem to catch them either. Thanks Suresh