Last Call Review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03
review-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2020-01-07-00

Request Review of draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 06)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2020-01-17
Requested 2019-12-20
Authors Yann Collet , Murray Kucherawy
I-D last updated 2021-03-09 (Latest revision 2020-12-18)
Completed reviews Secdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Daniel Migault (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -03 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -03 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Carlos Pignataro
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-kucherawy-rfc8478bis by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/sZr22PCf3GDEt4jAyi3_tveG334
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 06)
Result Ready
Completed 2020-01-07
review-kucherawy-rfc8478bis-03-opsdir-lc-pignataro-2020-01-07-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
treat these comments just like any other last call comments.

Summary: Focusing primarily on the diffs from RFC 8478 and secondarily on the
full document.

Nits:

Only one question: Should the Acknowledgements be augmented instead of
replaced? Like "Acks for RFC 8478 are ... Further for this revision are ..."

Thanks,

Carlos.