Last Call Review of draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-01
review-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-01-genart-lc-korhonen-2020-03-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 02) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2020-03-12 | |
Requested | 2020-02-13 | |
Authors | Mark Nottingham | |
I-D last updated | 2020-03-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -01
by Jouni Korhonen
(diff)
|
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Jouni Korhonen |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/slz4zrWXl8VGz3Ovq1ntBkC8KHs | |
Reviewed revision | 01 (document currently at 02) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2020-03-08 |
review-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-01-genart-lc-korhonen-2020-03-08-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-nottingham-how-did-that-get-into-the-repo-?? Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review Date: 2020-03-08 IETF LC End Date: 2020-03-12 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This very needed document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC with few minor nits. Major issues: None. Minor issues: 1) Line 116-117 states "This document uses ABNF [RFC5234], including by reference the following rules: ALPHA, DIGIT." Why RFC5234 APLHA and DIGIT rules need to be specifically called out? Nits/editorial comments: 1) Line 106 s/ike/like 2) Line 106 Expand CSRF on the first use (and possibly give an informative reference to it).