Last Call Review of draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-11
review-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-11-genart-lc-bryant-2024-10-01-00
Request | Review of | draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2024-10-23 | |
Requested | 2024-09-25 | |
Authors | Jyrki Alakuijala , Thai Duong , Evgenii Kliuchnikov , Zoltan Szabadka , Lode Vandevenne | |
I-D last updated | 2024-10-01 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -11
by Stewart Bryant
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Derrell Piper (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -13 by Derrell Piper |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Stewart Bryant |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/Fbtr92TxhXFpKjOR94PDtTyy09E | |
Reviewed revision | 11 (document currently at 13) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2024-10-01 |
review-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-11-genart-lc-bryant-2024-10-01-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-vandevenne-shared-brotli-format-11 Reviewer: Stewart Bryant Review Date: 2024-10-01 IETF LC End Date: 2024-10-23 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: A well written document that could be sent to the RFC Editor, but ought to have a number of minor issues addressed first. Major issues: None Minor issues: The document has six authors which I note are from the same company, when the maximum permitted by the IETF is normally five. ======= The text says: Shared brotli extends brotli [RFC7932] with support for shared dictionaries, larger LZ77 window and a framing format. it says similar in other places but not those words. Nits picks that and the draft header up and says: -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC7932, but the abstract doesn't seem to mention this, which it should. ====== Nits/editorial comments: * The framing format is a container format that allows to store multiple resources and refer to dictionaries. Incorrect grammar perhaps: * The framing format is a container format that allows storage of multiple resources and that reference dictionaries. or perhaps: * The framing format is a container format that allows the protocol to store multiple resources and refer to dictionaries. ====== This prevents an adversary to use a private dictionary with user secrets to compress content hosted on the adversary's origin. Incorrect grammar, perhaps This prevents an adversary from using a private dictionary with user secrets to compress content hosted on the adversary's origin. =======