The Eifel Detection Algorithm for TCP
RFC 3522
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2003-05-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2003-05-01
|
07 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2003-05-01
|
07 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2003-05-01
|
07 | Natalia Syracuse | published as RFC3522 in April 2003 |
|
2003-05-01
|
07 | Natalia Syracuse | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Syracuse, Natalia |
|
2003-04-30
|
07 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2003-02-27
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Hargest, Jacqueline |
|
2003-02-24
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent by Hargest, Jacqueline |
|
2003-02-20
|
07 | Jacqueline Hargest | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation by Hargest, Jacqueline |
|
2003-02-20
|
07 | (System) | IESG has approved the document |
|
2003-02-16
|
07 | Scott Bradner | 2003-02-16 - ops comment from an ops-dir reviewer > **** The Eifel Detection Algorithm for TCP (Experimental) > <draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-07.txt> I … 2003-02-16 - ops comment from an ops-dir reviewer > **** The Eifel Detection Algorithm for TCP (Experimental) > <draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-07.txt> I have read this briefly. To me this seems ok, but I am somewhat worried that this would open up a new type of ACK DOS as you could potentially guess timestamps and attack the algorithm. The 2' and 5' suggestions work around this, so I am (thinking out loud) if that should not be the default. OTH it's easier to take out the session by simply DoSing either the sender or the receiver... |
|
2003-02-12
|
07 | Scott Bradner | 2003-02-12 - put on IESG agenda |
|
2003-02-12
|
07 | Scott Bradner | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from AD is watching by Bradner, Scott |
|
2002-12-06
|
07 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-07.txt |
|
2002-11-04
|
06 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-06.txt |
|
2002-10-14
|
05 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-05.txt |
|
2002-08-31
|
07 | Scott Bradner | 2002-08-31 - note to Reiner<br>The last call for Eifel ended yesterday but it seems to us that there is still significant discussion going on so … 2002-08-31 - note to Reiner<br>The last call for Eifel ended yesterday but it seems to us that there is still significant discussion going on so it does not seem to be the right time to publish this as a RFC<br><br>could you summerize the issues that you have seen in the mailing list discussion and send the summary to the list to<br> 1/ get everyone in sync on what the issues are<br> 2/ focus discussion on those issues<br> |
|
2002-08-31
|
07 | Scott Bradner | A new comment added<br>by sob |
|
2002-08-09
|
07 | Scott Bradner | 2002-08-09 - WG last call, ends 8/30 |
|
2002-08-09
|
07 | Scott Bradner | responsible has been changed to Working Group from Unassigned |
|
2002-08-09
|
07 | Scott Bradner | Intended Status has been changed to Experimental from None |
|
2002-08-09
|
07 | Scott Bradner | Draft Added by sob |
|
2002-07-24
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-04.txt |
|
2002-02-22
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-03.txt |
|
2001-11-21
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-02.txt |
|
2001-11-15
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-01.txt |
|
2001-02-26
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-ietf-tsvwg-tcp-eifel-alg-00.txt |