The Text/Plain Format and DelSp Parameters
RFC 3676
Revision differences
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2015-10-14
|
04 | (System) | Notify list changed from to (None) |
|
2012-08-22
|
04 | (System) | post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Bill Fenner |
|
2004-02-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza |
|
2004-02-19
|
04 | (System) | RFC published |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the document |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Ned Freed | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed by Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-24
|
04 | Ned Freed | RFC Editor note added to ballot writeup; document now believed to be ready to go |
|
2003-11-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Removed from agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-21
|
04 | Amy Vezza | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot discuss] ABNF nits [updated for draft -04]: flowed-body = * ( paragraph / fixed-line / sig-sep ) I don't think ABNF permits … [Ballot discuss] ABNF nits [updated for draft -04]: flowed-body = * ( paragraph / fixed-line / sig-sep ) I don't think ABNF permits whitespace between a repeat and what's being repeated: repetition = [repeat] element repeat = 1*DIGIT / (*DIGIT "*" *DIGIT) element = rulename / group / option / char-val / num-val / prose-val non-sp-quote = < any character except NUL, CR, LF, SP, ">" > This is not a valid prose-val, since it contains a ">" inside: prose-val = "<" *(%x20-3D / %x3F-7E) ">" non-sp-quote might be better written as *(%x01-09 / %x0b / %x0c / %x0e-1f / %x21-3d / %x3f-7e) with a comment with the prose, since it is actually exactly representable in ABNF and that's presumably preferable. |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Thomas Narten | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Thomas Narten |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot discuss] ABNF nits: flowed-body = * ( paragraph / fixed-line / sig-sep ) I don't think ABNF permits whitespace between a repeat … [Ballot discuss] ABNF nits: flowed-body = * ( paragraph / fixed-line / sig-sep ) I don't think ABNF permits whitespace between a repeat and what's being repeated: repetition = [repeat] element repeat = 1*DIGIT / (*DIGIT "*" *DIGIT) element = rulename / group / option / char-val / num-val / prose-val flowed-line-unqt = stuffed-flowed / unstuffed-flowed ) flow CRLF This is a syntax error: should there be a matching parenthesis? non-sp-quote = < any character except NUL, CR, LF, SP, ">" > This is not a valid prose-val, since it contains a ">" inside: prose-val = "<" *(%x20-3D / %x3F-7E) ">" non-sp-quote might be better written as *(%x01-09 / %x0b / %x0c / %x0e-1f / %x21-3d / %x3f-7e) with a comment with the prose, since it is actually exactly representable in ABNF and that's presumably preferable. |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bert Wijnen has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Bert Wijnen |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] The abstract says: This standard supersedes the one specified in RFC 2646 Is it appropriate that is claims "This standard" I … [Ballot comment] The abstract says: This standard supersedes the one specified in RFC 2646 Is it appropriate that is claims "This standard" I think it would be better to use "This document" or "This specification" |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot comment] The abstract says: This standard supersedes the one specified in RFC 2646 Is it appropriate that is claims "This standard" I … [Ballot comment] The abstract says: This standard supersedes the one specified in RFC 2646 Is it appropriate that is claims "This standard" I think it would be better to use "This document" or "This specigfication" |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bert Wijnen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Undefined, has been recorded for by Bert Wijnen |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] Position for Bill Fenner has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Bill Fenner |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Bill Fenner | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Bill Fenner |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | Jon Peterson | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Jon Peterson |
|
2003-11-20
|
04 | (System) | New version available: draft-gellens-format-bis-04.txt |
|
2003-11-19
|
04 | Harald Alvestrand | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for by Harald Alvestrand |
|
2003-11-19
|
04 | Margaret Cullen | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Margaret Wasserman |
|
2003-11-19
|
04 | Russ Housley | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Russ Housley |
|
2003-11-19
|
04 | Ted Hardie | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for by Ted Hardie |
|
2003-11-18
|
04 | Steven Bellovin | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for by Steve Bellovin |
|
2003-11-18
|
03 | (System) | New version available: draft-gellens-format-bis-03.txt |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | Ned Freed | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2003-11-20 by Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | Ned Freed | State Changes to IESG Evaluation from In Last Call by Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | Ned Freed | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | Ned Freed | Ballot has been issued by Ned Freed |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | Ned Freed | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | (System) | Ballot writeup text was added |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | (System) | Last call text was added |
|
2003-11-03
|
04 | (System) | Ballot approval text was added |
|
2003-10-27
|
02 | (System) | New version available: draft-gellens-format-bis-02.txt |
|
2003-07-02
|
04 | Amy Vezza | Status date has been changed to 2003-7-28 from |
|
2003-07-02
|
04 | Amy Vezza | State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Vezza, Amy |
|
2003-06-30
|
04 | (System) | Last call sent |
|
2003-06-27
|
04 | Ned Freed | This is an update to RFC 2646 |
|
2003-06-27
|
04 | Ned Freed | Draft Added by Freed, Ned |
|
2003-06-27
|
01 | (System) | New version available: draft-gellens-format-bis-01.txt |
|
2003-02-25
|
00 | (System) | New version available: draft-gellens-format-bis-00.txt |