The Generalized TTL Security Mechanism (GTSM)
RFC 5082

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sam Hartman
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2007-11-05
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2007-11-05
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5082' added by Amy Vezza
2007-10-31
10 (System) RFC published
2007-07-11
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2007-07-11
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2007-07-11
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2007-07-10
10 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2007-07-10
10 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2007-07-10
10 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2007-07-09
10 Ross Callon State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Ross Callon
2007-06-29
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Patrick Cain.
2007-06-26
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2007-06-25
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-10.txt
2007-06-22
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2007-06-21
2007-06-21
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2007-06-21
10 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sam Hartman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sam Hartman
2007-06-21
10 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2007-06-21
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2007-06-21
10 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
Section 5.4 conclusions apply only if the GTSM processing
cannot associate initial and non-initial fragments to
each other. There does not seem to …
2007-06-21
10 Mark Townsley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Mark Townsley
2007-06-21
10 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jon Peterson
2007-06-20
10 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2007-06-20
10 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2007-06-20
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 5.4., paragraph 3:
>    As such, it is highly recommended for GTSM-protected protocols to
>    avoid fragmentation and reassembly by …
2007-06-20
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Section 3., paragraph 4:
>          The TTL field in all IP packets used for transmission of
>      …
2007-06-20
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2007-06-19
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2007-06-19
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2007-06-19
10 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2007-06-18
10 Ross Callon State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ross Callon
2007-06-18
10 Ron Bonica
[Ballot comment]
Section 6: The applicability statement is pretty good about saying that the value of GTSM is inversely proportional to the hop-count between the …
2007-06-18
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2007-06-18
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2007-06-18
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
There is no place in the document that mentions that this standards track RFC would obsolete an Experimental RFC. I believe that the …
2007-06-17
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot comment]
I dislike it when documents speak of "trusted" packets, interfaces or
peers without a discussion of what they are trusted to do.  In …
2007-06-17
10 Sam Hartman
[Ballot discuss]
The discussion of fragmentation does not discuss attacks on integrity.
If you are accepting `unknown' packets into a protocol session , then
you …
2007-06-17
10 Sam Hartman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sam Hartman
2007-06-17
10 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded by David Ward
2007-06-15
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2007-06-13
10 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ross Callon
2007-06-13
10 Ross Callon Ballot has been issued by Ross Callon
2007-06-13
10 Ross Callon Created "Approve" ballot
2007-06-13
10 Ross Callon Placed on agenda for telechat - 2007-06-21 by Ross Callon
2007-06-11
10 Yoshiko Fong IANA Last Call Comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand
this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2007-06-07
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Patrick Cain
2007-06-07
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Patrick Cain
2007-06-01
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2007-06-01
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2007-06-01
10 Ross Callon State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Ross Callon
2007-06-01
10 Ross Callon Last Call was requested by Ross Callon
2007-06-01
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2007-06-01
10 (System) Last call text was added
2007-06-01
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-06-01
10 Ross Callon
Proto writeup by John Scudder:

1.  Have the chairs personally reviewed this version of the
Internet Draft (ID), and in particular, do they believe this …
2007-05-31
10 Ross Callon State Changes to Publication Requested from AD is watching by Ross Callon
2007-01-31
10 Bill Fenner State Change Notice email list have been change to rtgwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org from fenner@research.att.com, zinin@psg.com
2007-01-31
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-09.txt
2006-12-14
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-08.txt
2006-11-26
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-07.txt
2006-10-05
10 Bill Fenner Shepherding AD has been changed to Ross Callon from Alex Zinin
2006-08-31
10 (System) State Changes to AD is watching from Dead by system
2006-08-30
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-06.txt
2005-11-07
10 (System) State Changes to Dead from AD is watching by system
2005-11-07
10 (System) Document has expired
2005-04-14
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-05.txt
2004-09-30
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-04.txt
2004-09-29
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-03.txt
2004-05-04
10 Alex Zinin Draft Added by Alex Zinin
2004-04-30
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-02.txt
2004-03-22
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-01.txt
2004-03-17
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-rtgwg-rfc3682bis-00.txt