Security Requirements for the Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) Protocol
RFC 5458
Revision differences
Document history
Date | By | Action |
---|---|---|
2020-01-21
|
(System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (added Verified Errata tag) |
2018-12-20
|
(System) | Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The MPEG-2 standard defined by ISO 13818-1 supports a range of transmission methods for a variety … Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'The MPEG-2 standard defined by ISO 13818-1 supports a range of transmission methods for a variety of services. This document provides a threat analysis and derives the security requirements when using the Transport Stream, TS, to support an Internet network-layer using Unidirectional Lightweight Encapsulation (ULE) defined in RFC 4326. The document also provides the motivation for link-layer security for a ULE Stream. A ULE Stream may be used to send IPv4 packets, IPv6 packets, and other Protocol Data Units (PDUs) to an arbitrarily large number of Receivers supporting unicast and/or multicast transmission. The analysis also describes applicability to the Generic Stream Encapsulation (GSE) defined by the Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB) Project. This memo provides information for the Internet community.') |
2017-05-16
|
(System) | Changed document authors from "Michael Noisternig, Prashant Pillai" to "Michael Noisternig, Prashant Pillai, Haitham Cruickshank, Sunil Iyengar" |
2015-10-14
|
(System) | Notify list changed from ipdvb-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipdvb-sec-req@ietf.org to (None) |
2009-03-27
|
Cindy Morgan | State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan |
2009-03-27
|
Cindy Morgan | [Note]: 'RFC 5458' added by Cindy Morgan |
2009-03-24
|
(System) | RFC published |