ENUM Implementation Issues and Experiences
RFC 5483

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
11 (System) Notify list changed from enum-chairs@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Pasi Eronen
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
11 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Lars Eggert
2009-03-05
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Cindy Morgan
2009-03-05
11 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 5483' added by Cindy Morgan
2009-03-03
11 (System) RFC published
2009-01-28
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2009-01-28
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2009-01-28
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2009-01-27
11 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2009-01-27
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2009-01-27
11 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2009-01-27
11 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2009-01-27
11 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2009-01-13
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Amy Vezza
2008-12-10
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] Position for Lars Eggert has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Lars Eggert
2008-12-09
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2008-12-09
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2008-11-25
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2008-11-24
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pasi Eronen has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Pasi Eronen
2008-11-24
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
2008-11-24
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Updated on Nov 24th to reflect remaining issues:

The document says:

  The ERE sub-field matches against the "Application Unique String";
  for …
2008-11-24
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I think that having a document like this is essential. Thanks for
writing it. However, there are some remaining problems.

The document says: …
2008-11-24
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I think that having a document like this is essential. Thanks for
writing it. However, there are some remaining problems.

Like other ADs, …
2008-11-20
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-11.txt
2008-11-05
(System)
Posted related IPR disclosure: Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC's Statement about IPR related to RFC 3953, RFC 4415, RFC 4759, RFC 4769, RFC 4002, RFC …
2008-10-22
11 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
There hasn't been any discussion (not a single email to me, or on
the ENUM WG list) in the over six months since …
2008-10-06
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2008-10-06
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-10.txt
2008-04-26
11 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Vidya Narayanan was rejected
2008-04-11
11 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2008-04-10
2008-04-10
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Amy Vezza
2008-04-10
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
I jave cleared ny DISCUSS relying on Pasis's.

I believe accepting the text suggested by Chris in his comment would be a good …
2008-04-10
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Dan Romascanu
2008-04-10
11 Chris Newman
[Ballot comment]
Suggest adding one sentence to section 2.1:

This document does not itself revise DDDS or ENUM, but is intended to
provide technical input …
2008-04-10
11 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2008-04-10
11 Chris Newman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Chris Newman
2008-04-10
11 David Ward
[Ballot comment]
At some point we need to straighten out the category of Info, BCP for docs/specs that change the format, functionality and behavior of …
2008-04-10
11 David Ward [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by David Ward
2008-04-10
11 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot discuss]
Documenting implementation experiences and pitfalls is something
that we at IETF should do more, and I'm sure the intended audience
will find this …
2008-04-10
11 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2008-04-09
11 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(1) The backreference pattern is discussed in sections 8, 9, and 10.
These are "Collected Implications for ENUM Provisioning",
"Collected Implications for ENUM …
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(1) The backreference pattern is discussed in sections 8, 9, and 10.
These are "Collected Implications for ENUM Provisioning",
"Collected Implications for ENUM …
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
I am generally happy with this as an Informational document, but am
concerned on one point.

Section 6.2.3.2 seems to update RFC 3761 …
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
I am generally happy with this as an Informational document, but am
concerned on one point.

Section 6.2.3.2 seems to update RFC 3761 …
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2008-04-09
11 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
The backreference pattern is discussed in sections 8, 9, and 10.
These are "Collected Implications for ENUM Provisioning",
"Collected Implications for ENUM Clients", …
2008-04-09
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
Support Peter Koch's comments from the DNS-DIR review that appear in Dan's DISCUSS.
2008-04-09
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot comment]
Support Peter Koch's comments from the DNS-DIR review
2008-04-09
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Ron Bonica
2008-04-09
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] Position for Ron Bonica has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Ron Bonica
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
The document says:

  ENUM Clients have also been known to discard NAPTRs with a non-
  trivial ("non-greedy") ERE sub-field expression (i.e. …
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
I think that having a document like this is essential. Thanks for
writing it. However, there are some remaining problems.

Like other ADs, …
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Like other ADs, I am concerned about the category of this RFC and
the statements it makes. I am actually unclear whether either …
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Like other ADs, I am concerned about the category of this RFC and
the statements it makes. I am actually unclear whether either …
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
> This example MUST be written as:
> * IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+sip" "!^\+4655(.*)$!sip:\1@example.net!" .

I think this use of RFC …
2008-04-09
11 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2008-04-09
11 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2008-04-08
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot comment]
(And if it isn't going for Informational, I have a different review ready, because I read it thinking it was going for BCP.)
2008-04-08
11 Lars Eggert
[Ballot discuss]
Agree with Dan. Assuming this is going for Informational, making recommendations about how the protocol spec is to be interpreted and implemented, especially …
2008-04-08
11 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2008-04-07
11 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2008-04-07
11 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2008-04-07
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
This is planned to be cleared, but we need to discuss the intended status of this document. The header says BCP, although the …
2008-04-07
11 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2008-04-07
11 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
DDDS appears in the Abstract, but is expanded only later at the third occurence. NAPTR is broadly used but never expanded in the …
2008-04-03
11 Jon Peterson Placed on agenda for telechat - 2008-04-10 by Jon Peterson
2008-04-03
11 Jon Peterson State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Jon Peterson
2008-04-03
11 Jon Peterson [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Jon Peterson
2008-04-03
11 Jon Peterson Ballot has been issued by Jon Peterson
2008-04-03
11 Jon Peterson Created "Approve" ballot
2008-04-01
11 Jon Peterson State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2008-04-01
11 Cindy Morgan State Changes to Publication Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Cindy Morgan
2008-04-01
11 Cindy Morgan
WG Chair Write-Up for Publication Request

Working Group: Telephone Number Mapping [ENUM]


Title? :  ENUM Implementation Issues and Experiences

Author(s)??? : Lawerence Conroy et.al. …
2008-02-14
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-09.txt
2008-01-29
11 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2008-01-24
11 Amanda Baber
IANA Last Call comments:

Upon approval of this document, the IANA will make the following
changes in "Enumservice Registrations" registry located at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/enum-services

OLD:

Enumservice …
2008-01-18
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Vidya Narayanan
2008-01-18
11 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Vidya Narayanan
2008-01-15
11 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2008-01-15
11 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2008-01-15
11 Jon Peterson Last Call was requested by Jon Peterson
2008-01-15
11 Jon Peterson State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Jon Peterson
2008-01-15
11 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-01-15
11 (System) Last call text was added
2008-01-15
11 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2007-11-12
11 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2007-11-12
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-08.txt
2007-09-18
11 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from AD Evaluation by Jon Peterson
2007-06-14
11 Jon Peterson State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Jon Peterson
2007-04-19
11 Dinara Suleymanova Draft Added by Dinara Suleymanova in state Publication Requested
2007-03-22
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-07.txt
2007-03-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-06.txt
2006-06-29
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-05.txt
2006-03-09
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-04.txt
2005-10-18
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-03.txt
2005-07-01
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-02.txt
2004-10-25
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-01.txt
2004-07-12
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-enum-experiences-00.txt