DNS SRV Resource Records for AFS
RFC 5864

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 05 (System) Notify list changed from rra@stanford.edu, jhutz@cmu.edu to jhutz@cmu.edu
2012-08-22 05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22 05 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2010-04-21 05 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue by Amy Vezza
2010-04-21 05 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'RFC 5864' added by Amy Vezza
2010-04-20 05 (System) RFC published
2010-03-12 05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-25 05 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-02-25 05 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-02-25 05 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-02-25 05 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-02-25 05 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-02-25 05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Robert Sparks
2010-02-24 05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-02-24 05 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-05.txt
2010-02-23 05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-02-23 05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-02-19 05 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-02-18
2010-02-18 05 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-02-18 05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Updated comment after discussion with authors

I support Tim's Discuss and note further that RFC 1183 (which predates
the different classifications of ...
2010-02-18 05 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-02-18 05 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-02-18 05 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-02-18 05 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2010-02-18 05 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-02-18 05 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I support Tim's Discuss and note further that RFC 1183 (which predates
the different classifications of RFCs) says...

  This memo defines ...
2010-02-18 05 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2010-02-17 05 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2010-02-17 05 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2010-02-17 05 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2010-02-16 05 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
I will clear on the call after the discussion, but I would like to cosndier whether this document
should be standards track or ...
2010-02-16 05 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
I would like to discuss whether this document should be standards track or informational.
2010-02-16 05 Tim Polk [Ballot discuss]
I would like to discuss whether this document should be standards track or informational.
2010-02-16 05 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-02-16 05 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The following sentence (from the end of page 5) needs clarification
"This server ordering MAY be done either per call or for the ...
2010-02-16 05 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2010-02-16 05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
2010-02-16 05 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
What is the [AFS1] Infomative Reference? If it's a book then please mention the publisher. If it's a paper then please ...
2010-02-16 05 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-02-16 05 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 4., paragraph 8:
>        _<service>._<proto>.<name>
...
>    <name> MUST be the AFS cell name for which the ...
2010-02-16 05 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-02-15 05 Alexey Melnikov
[Note]: 'Jeffrey Hutzelman (jhutz at cmu dot edu) is the document shepherd.
After discussing this with Jari I am thinking that the normative downreference to ...
2010-02-15 05 Alexey Melnikov
Shepherding write-up:

(1.a)  Who is the Document Shepherd for this document?  Has the
      Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version ...
2010-02-13 05 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alexey Melnikov
2010-02-13 05 Alexey Melnikov Ballot has been issued by Alexey Melnikov
2010-02-13 05 Alexey Melnikov Created "Approve" ballot
2010-02-12 05 Alexey Melnikov
[Note]: 'Jeffrey Hutzelman (jhutz at cmu dot edu) is the document shepherd.
After discussing this with Jari I am thinking that the normative downreference to ...
2010-02-12 05 Alexey Melnikov State Change Notice email list have been change to rra@stanford.edu, jhutz@cmu.edu from rra@stanford.edu, draft-allbery-afs-srv-records@tools.ietf.org
2010-02-12 05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Alexey Melnikov
2010-02-11 04 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-04.txt
2010-02-11 05 Alexey Melnikov
AD review comments were addressed in -03:

Updates: 1183 (if approved)                            ...
2010-02-05 05 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-01-29 05 Alexey Melnikov Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-02-18 by Alexey Melnikov
2010-01-25 05 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

NO IANA Considerations section.
We understand this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-01-09 05 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Tina Tsou was rejected
2010-01-09 05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Tina Tsou
2010-01-09 05 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Hannes Tschofenig
2010-01-08 05 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-01-08 05 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-01-08 05 Alexey Melnikov
[Note]: 'After discussing this with Jari I am thinking that the normative downreference to RFC 1183 (Experimental) is Ok in this case.
' added by Alexey ...
2010-01-08 05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov
2010-01-08 05 Alexey Melnikov Last Call was requested by Alexey Melnikov
2010-01-08 05 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-01-08 05 (System) Last call text was added
2010-01-08 05 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-01-07 05 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-01-07 03 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-03.txt
2010-01-02 05 Alexey Melnikov State Changes to AD Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Publication Requested::AD Followup by Alexey Melnikov
2009-12-17 05 Alexey Melnikov Draft Added by Alexey Melnikov in state Publication Requested
2009-12-17 02 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-02.txt
2009-10-12 01 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-01.txt
2009-10-03 00 (System) New version available: draft-allbery-afs-srv-records-00.txt