RADIUS Design Guidelines
RFC 6158

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
19 (System) Notify list changed from radext-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-radext-design@ietf.org, gdweber@gmail.com, aland@freeradius.org to (None)
2012-08-22
19 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Cullen Jennings
2012-08-22
19 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Jari Arkko
2011-03-14
19 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-03-14
19 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'BCP 158; RFC 6158' added
2011-03-11
19 (System) RFC published
2010-11-23
19 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2010-11-23
19 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-11-23
19 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2010-11-22
19 Amy Vezza IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-11-22
19 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2010-11-22
19 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-11-22
19 Amy Vezza Approval announcement text regenerated
2010-11-22
19 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup text changed
2010-11-19
19 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-11-18
2010-11-18
19 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation.
2010-11-18
19 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-18
19 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-18
19 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-11-18
19 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-18
19 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-17
19 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2010-11-17
19 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
2.  Guidelines

        Attributes within the standard space are appropriate for this
        purpose, and are ...
2010-11-17
19 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-17
19 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
>                        RADIUS Design Guidelines

  Since this document actually describes design guidelines ...
2010-11-17
19 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-16
19 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-15
19 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-13
19 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Comment updated for new revision
No issues found
Thanks for addressing my previous comments
2010-11-13
19 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2010-11-11
19 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-11-18
2010-11-11
19 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup.
2010-11-11
19 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2010-11-08
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-11-08
19 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-19.txt
2010-10-27
19 Dan Romascanu State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-27
19 Amy Vezza State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-10-14
19 Amanda Baber
IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are no IANA
Actions that need to be completed.
2010-10-12
19 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-10-12
19 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-10-12
19 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
19 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-12
18 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-18.txt
2010-07-26
17 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-17.txt
2010-07-09
16 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-16.txt
2010-06-21
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-15.txt
2010-06-07
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-06-07
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-14.txt
2010-04-27
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2010-04-14
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-04-14
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-13.txt
2010-03-24
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2010-03-22
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-12.txt
2010-02-19
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-11.txt
2009-12-04
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-12-04
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-10.txt
2009-11-13
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2009-10-12
19 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] Position for Jari Arkko has been changed to Yes from Discuss by Jari Arkko
2009-10-12
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-10-12
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-09.txt
2009-09-17
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2009-09-06
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-08.txt
2009-05-24
19 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker.
2009-05-18
19 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Cullen Jennings
2009-05-10
19 Cullen Jennings [Ballot discuss]
Waiting for reply on questions around consensus on Zorn's email
2009-05-10
19 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] Position for Cullen Jennings has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Cullen Jennings
2009-05-07
19 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2009-05-07
19 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
I do agree that for functionality FOO, both the functionality itself
and the MIB, RADIUS, etc. work should take place in the same ...
2009-05-07
19 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
Great doc! I will vote Yes on it, but I wanted to discuss two issues
first, one is a Discuss-level problem and the ...
2009-05-07
19 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2009-05-07
19 Jari Arkko [Ballot comment]
2009-05-07
19 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
The section on complex attributes IMO bypasses some of the considerations.
Let me say that I agree with the recommendation to avoid complex ...
2009-05-06
19 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
It might be valuable to supplement the current security considerations section with
a discussion of issues that arise if SDOs do not follow ...
2009-05-05
19 Cullen Jennings [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Cullen Jennings
2009-05-05
19 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system
2009-04-22
19 Pasi Eronen [Ballot comment]
2009-04-22
19 Cullen Jennings State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Cullen Jennings
2009-04-22
19 Ross Callon [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ross Callon
2009-04-22
19 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2009-04-22
19 Lisa Dusseault [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lisa Dusseault
2009-04-22
19 Pasi Eronen
[Ballot comment]
I have a question about some parts that look a lot like editorial
requirements for future Internet-Drafts:

Section 2.1.3 (paragraph beginning ...
2009-04-22
19 Pasi Eronen [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Pasi Eronen
2009-04-22
19 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
"the above procedure" in 3.1.1 (page 17) could be hard to follow for some readers. Recommend providing a more explicit pointer.
2009-04-22
19 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Robert Sparks
2009-04-22
19 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2009-04-21
19 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
This is a fine document. Some minor comments:

3.3.  RADIUS Operational Model

  The RADIUS operational model includes several assumptions:

  ...
2009-04-20
19 Alexey Melnikov [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Alexey Melnikov
2009-04-20
19 Alexey Melnikov
[Ballot comment]
This is a fine document. Some comments:

3.3.  RADIUS Operational Model

  The RADIUS operational model includes several assumptions:

    ...
2009-04-20
19 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Gonzalo Camarillo on 8 April 2009 provides some
  editorial suggestions.

  ID nits complains that reference [8] appears ...
2009-04-20
19 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2009-04-20
19 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
Trivial: does the "text" data type include a trailing '\0' byte?  I ask because there has been confusion about this point in ...
2009-04-20
19 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ralph Droms
2009-04-20
19 Magnus Westerlund [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Magnus Westerlund
2009-04-20
19 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
Section 2.1.1, paragraph 2:
>    The Length field in the RADIUS packet header is defined in [RFC2865]
>    Section ...
2009-04-20
19 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2009-04-18
19 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2009-04-18
19 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Trivial, but...
Section 2.1.1 says that some address data types are in "network byte order" while others are "most significant octet ...
2009-04-16
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2009-04-16
19 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2009-04-23 by Dan Romascanu
2009-04-16
19 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2009-04-16
19 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued by Dan Romascanu
2009-04-16
19 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2009-03-23
19 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2009-03-20
19 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

We understand that this document does not request any IANA actions.
2009-03-13
19 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2009-03-09
19 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2009-03-08
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::AD Followup by Dan Romascanu
2009-03-08
19 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2009-03-08
19 Dan Romascanu The WG chairs and the shepherding AD decided to send the document to a second two-weeks IETF Last Call prior to IETF-74
2009-03-05
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-07.txt
2009-02-24
19 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2009-02-24
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-06.txt
2009-02-19
19 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Phillip Hallam-Baker.
2009-02-17
19 Dan Romascanu
message from the WG Chair: There are still issues open on this.  Now that we have new boilerplate, it will be
possible to submit ...
2009-02-17
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2008-11-11
19 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2008-11-11
19 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Phillip Hallam-Baker
2008-11-10
19 Amanda Baber IANA Last Call comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand
this document to have NO IANA Actions.
2008-10-28
19 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2008-10-28
19 Dan Romascanu State Changes to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested by Dan Romascanu
2008-10-28
19 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2008-10-28
19 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2008-10-28
19 (System) Last call text was added
2008-10-28
19 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2008-09-10
19 Dan Romascanu
Proto write-up from proto-shepherd Bernard Aboba

Title:  RADIUS Design Guidelines
I-D:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt

Status: Best Current Practice

Response to ...
2008-09-10
19 Dan Romascanu Proto-write-up from proto-shepherd Bernard Aboba
2008-09-10
19 Dan Romascanu Draft Added by Dan Romascanu in state Publication Requested
2008-08-26
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-05.txt
2008-07-07
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-04.txt
2008-06-25
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-03.txt
2007-12-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-02.txt
2007-11-15
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-01.txt
2007-09-06
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-radext-design-00.txt