ZRTP: Media Path Key Agreement for Unicast Secure RTP
RFC 6189

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
22 (System) Notify list changed from prz@mit.edu, alan.b.johnston@gmail.com, jon@callas.org, draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
22 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
22 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2011-04-11
22 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-04-11
22 Cindy Morgan [Note]: 'RFC 6189' added
2011-04-11
22 (System) RFC published
2010-06-28
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2010-06-28
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from In Progress
2010-06-28
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2010-06-28
22 Amy Vezza State Changes to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent by Amy Vezza
2010-06-25
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2010-06-25
22 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2010-06-25
22 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2010-06-25
22 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2010-06-25
22 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2010-06-25
22 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Undefined by Tim Polk
2010-06-25
22 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to Undefined from Discuss by Tim Polk
2010-06-24
22 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by Sean Turner
2010-06-21
22 David Harrington [Ballot discuss]
2010-06-21
22 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to No Objection from Discuss by David Harrington
2010-06-21
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Sec 4.1.1: Should the should be SHOULD:

Both
parties should choose the highest version number that appear in both
parties ...
2010-06-21
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
[Updating to clear addressed DISCUSS positions.]

This is a fine document.  I've got a couple of DISCUSSes:

1) addressed in -22 ...
2010-06-17
22 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-22.txt
2010-06-03
22 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Sec 4.1.1: Should the should be SHOULD:

Both
parties should choose the highest version number that appear in both
parties ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
[I've updated these to provide more information at the AD's request.]

This is a fine document.  I've got a ...
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(a) Section 3 could be interpreted as requiring a single Hello-HelloACK
exchange.  A few pages later, it becomes clear that both the ...
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
[Revised for clarity at teh request of the sponsoring AD]

A very thorough piece of work.  I enjoyed reviewing this one, and ...
2010-06-03
22 Russ Housley [Ballot comment]
2010-06-03
22 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss, based on feedback from Colin Perkins during  TSV-DIR review:
"I've sent various comments regarding draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp, most 
recently on ...
2010-06-03
22 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
This is a discuss-discuss, based on feedback from Colin Perkins during  TSV-DIR review:
I've sent various comments regarding draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp, most 
recently on ...
2010-06-03
22 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by David Harrington
2010-06-03
22 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Sec 4.1.1: Should the should be SHOULD:

Both
parties should choose the highest version number that appear in both
parties ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine document.  I've got a couple of DISCUSSes:

1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS (i.e., nothing for the ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Sec 4.1.1: Should the should be SHOULD:

Both
parties should choose the highest version number that appear in both
parties ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine document.  I've got a couple of DISCUSSes:

1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS (i.e., nothing for the ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Sec 4.1.1: Should the should be SHOULD:

Both
parties should choose the highest version number that appear in both
parties ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is a fine document.  I've got a couple of DISCUSSes:

1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS (i.e., nothing for the ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
As noted in the SECDIR review:

1) Some discussion about PMTU discovery is needed because it appears that the signature block can exceed ...
2010-06-03
22 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-06-03
22 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
(a) Section 3 could be interpreted as requiring a single Hello-HelloACK
exchange.  A few pages later, it becomes clear that both the ...
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
A very thorough piece of work.  I enjoyed reviewing this one, and
look forward to clearing my discuss quickly so this can ...
2010-06-03
22 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Section 3 could be interpreted as requiring a single Hello-HelloACK
exchange.  A few pages later, it becomes clear that both the initiator ...
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
A very thorough piece of work.  I enjoyed reviewing this one, and
look forward to clearing my discuss quickly so this can ...
2010-06-03
22 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-06-03
22 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-06-03
22 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I think it would be tidier to move the Appendix (currently Section 14) to the end of the document.

---

Can I assume that ...
2010-06-02
22 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Please check the division of references into normative and informative. For example, I doubt that [XEP-0262] is a normative reference (because developers don ...
2010-06-02
22 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Peter Saint-Andre
2010-06-02
22 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-05-31
22 Russ Housley
[Ballot comment]
The Gen-ART Review by Pete McCann on 17-May-2010 raised a question:
  >
  > I see that in draft-19, a change was ...
2010-05-31
22 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-31
22 (System) State Changes to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation - Defer by system
2010-05-21
21 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-21.txt
2010-05-21
22 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20
2010-05-18
22 Tim Polk State Changes to IESG Evaluation - Defer from IESG Evaluation by Tim Polk
2010-05-12
22 Robert Sparks Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20 by Robert Sparks
2010-05-12
22 Robert Sparks State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Robert Sparks
2010-05-12
22 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2010-05-12
22 Robert Sparks Ballot has been issued by Robert Sparks
2010-05-12
22 Robert Sparks Created "Approve" ballot
2010-05-11
20 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-20.txt
2010-05-11
19 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-19.txt
2010-04-26
18 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-18.txt
2010-04-14
22 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-04-12
22 Amanda Baber
IANA questions/comments:

QUESTIONS:

- Do you want to create registries for Message Types, Hash Types,
Cipher Types, Auth Tag Types, Key Agreement Types, SAS Types ...
2010-04-01
22 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Dan Harkins.
2010-03-19
22 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2010-03-19
22 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Dan Harkins
2010-03-17
22 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-03-17
22 Cindy Morgan State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-03-17
22 Robert Sparks Last Call was requested by Robert Sparks
2010-03-17
22 Robert Sparks State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Robert Sparks
2010-03-17
22 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-03-17
22 (System) Last call text was added
2010-03-17
22 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-03-17
22 Robert Sparks Note field has been cleared by Robert Sparks
2010-03-17
22 Robert Sparks
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2010-01-21
22 Robert Sparks Draft Added by Robert Sparks in state AD Evaluation
2010-01-20
17 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-17.txt
2009-11-10
16 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-16.txt
2009-09-05
22 (System) Document has expired
2009-03-04
15 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-15.txt
2009-02-03
14 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-14.txt
2009-01-26
13 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-13.txt
2009-01-10
12 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-12.txt
2008-11-26
11 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-11.txt
2008-10-25
10 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-10.txt
2008-09-28
09 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-09.txt
2008-09-23
08 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-08.txt
2008-06-03
07 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-07.txt
2008-03-11
06 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-06.txt
2008-02-25
05 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-05.txt
2007-07-10
04 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-04.txt
2007-03-07
03 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-03.txt
2006-10-24
02 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-02.txt
2006-03-07
01 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-01.txt
2006-03-01
00 (System) New version available: draft-zimmermann-avt-zrtp-00.txt