Internet Protocols for the Smart Grid
RFC 6272

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
15 (System) Notify list changed from fred@cisco.com, dmm@1-4-5.net to (None)
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Robert Sparks
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
15 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the Yes position for David Harrington
2011-06-22
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Published from RFC Ed Queue.
2011-06-21
15 (System) RFC published
2011-04-25
15 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent.
2011-04-22
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from In Progress
2011-04-22
15 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2011-04-22
15 Cindy Morgan IESG state changed to Approved-announcement sent
2011-04-22
15 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2011-04-22
15 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2011-04-22
15 Cindy Morgan Approval announcement text regenerated
2011-04-22
15 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-15.txt
2011-04-21
15 Russ Housley State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::AD Followup from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-04-21
14 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-14.txt
2011-03-15
15 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] Position for David Harrington has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-03-15
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to Yes from No Objection
2011-03-15
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot comment]
2011-03-15
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2011-03-14
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-14
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-14
15 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-03-14
13 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-13.txt
2011-03-07
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated

#1) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At ...
2011-03-03
15 Cindy Morgan Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-03-03
15 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-03-03
15 David Harrington
[Ballot discuss]
Some of the references for SNMP are to RFC1157, which is Historic.
I recommend referring to RFC3410, an Informational RFC that describes the ...
2011-03-03
15 David Harrington [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-03
15 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-03-03
15 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
This is a very well written document. Thank you.

Just a couple of comments that you may consider at your own choosing.

There ...
2011-03-03
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. [SmartGrid] - I am unconfortable to providing wikipedia references - not because I do not trust the principle of shared wisdom, but because they ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Politics layer is missing from Figure 1 ;)

#2) <nit alert>r/"host./"host."</nit alert>

#3) Could we point to SNMPv3 instead ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Politics layer is missing from Figure 1.

#2) <nit alert>r/"host./"host."</nit alert>

#3) Could we point to SNMPv3 instead ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Politics layer is missing from Figure 1.

#2) <nit alert>r/"host./"host."</nit alert>

#3) Could we point to SNMPv3 instead ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
technical comments:
2.2

OLD
While it is popular to complain about the security of the Internet,
solutions to many popular Internet security ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#5) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#5) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
technical comments:
2.2

OLD
While it is popular to complain about the security of the Internet,
solutions to many popular Internet security ...
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
Two actionable discusses, one discuss-discuss:

Actionable 1: Please add a brief section 3.1.5 Key Management Infrastructures to cover PKI (PKIX) and ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Politics layer is missing from Figure 1.

#2) <nit alert>r/"host./"host."</nit alert>

#3) Could we point to SNMPv3 instead ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#5) Sec 2.2.2: How about we use CIA, Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability (the classic model), and throw in Authenticity:

At the ...
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
technical comments:
2.2

OLD
While it is popular to complain about the security of the Internet,
solutions to many popular Internet security ...
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
One actionable discuss, one discuss-discuss:

Actionable: Please add a brief section 3.1.5 Key Management Infrastructures to cover PKI (PKIX) and Kerberos ...
2011-03-03
15 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-03
15 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) Politics layer is missing from Figure 1.

#2) <nit alert>r/"host./"host."</nit alert>

#3) Could we point to SNMPv3 instead ...
2011-03-03
15 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-03
15 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
None of the comments below taken alone is discuss-worthy, but I do think at least several of them should really be addressed.

Section ...
2011-03-03
15 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
15 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
The introduction states:

  o  Section 3 outlines the set of protocols that will be useful in
      Smart Grid deployment ...
2011-03-02
15 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-02
15 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
1) Would it be possible (and would it preserve the intended meaning) to say "identifies the key infrastructure protocols of the Internet Protocol ...
2011-03-02
15 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-02
15 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
Fine work.

I should have liked to see some forward reference to the Appendix from early in the document since (I assume) the ...
2011-03-02
15 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-03-02
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot comment]
1. [SmartGrid] - I am unconfortable to providing wikipedia references - not because I do not trust the principle of shared wisdom, but because they ...
2011-03-02
15 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
Before I vote YES on this document I would suggest fixing a few obvious editorial problems. Fixes should be easy.

1. Section 2 ...
2011-03-02
15 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-03-02
15 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-03-01
12 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-12.txt
2011-03-01
15 Russ Housley
I have been waiting for several weeks for some folks in the Security Area to provide text that matches their Last Call comments.  That ...
2011-03-01
15 Russ Housley State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed.
2011-03-01
15 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-03-03
2011-02-28
15 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2011-02-28
15 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued
2011-02-28
15 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2011-02-28
15 Russ Housley State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed.
2011-02-08
15 Russ Housley State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-01-14
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR Completed. Reviewer: Rolf Winter.
2011-01-10
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman.
2011-01-05
15 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-12-21
15 Amanda Baber We understand that this document does not require any IANA actions.
2010-12-17
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Rolf Winter
2010-12-17
15 David Harrington Request for Last Call review by TSVDIR is assigned to Rolf Winter
2010-12-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2010-12-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2010-12-08
15 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2010-12-08
15 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To ...
2010-12-08
15 Russ Housley Last Call was requested
2010-12-08
15 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-12-08
15 (System) Last call text was added
2010-12-08
15 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-12-08
15 Russ Housley State changed to Last Call Requested from Publication Requested.
2010-11-15
15 Cindy Morgan
I am requesting that draft-baker-ietf-core be published as an AD-sponsored individual submission. It relates to the Smart Grid.

(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd ...
2010-11-15
15 Russ Housley Draft added in state Publication Requested
2010-11-12
11 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-11.txt
2010-11-08
10 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-10.txt
2010-10-25
09 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-09.txt
2010-09-26
08 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-08.txt
2010-08-17
07 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-07.txt
2010-07-26
06 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-06.txt
2010-07-09
05 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-05.txt
2010-04-26
15 (System) Document has expired
2009-11-28
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Charlie Kaufman.
2009-10-23
04 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-04.txt
2009-10-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2009-10-16
15 Samuel Weiler Request for Early review by SECDIR is assigned to Charlie Kaufman
2009-10-03
03 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-03.txt
2009-09-29
02 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-02.txt
2009-09-18
01 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-01.txt
2009-09-16
00 (System) New version available: draft-baker-ietf-core-00.txt