Problem Statement and Requirements for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Routing
RFC 6606

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2018-12-20
10 (System)
Received changes through RFC Editor sync (changed abstract to 'IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs) are formed by devices that are compatible with …
2015-10-14
10 (System) Notify list changed from 6lowpan-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements@ietf.org to (None)
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Sean Turner
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Stewart Bryant
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Tim Polk
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Dan Romascanu
2012-08-22
10 (System) post-migration administrative database adjustment to the No Objection position for Adrian Farrel
2012-05-30
10 (System) RFC published
2012-03-19
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC from RFC-Ed-Ack
2012-03-19
10 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan IESG has approved the document
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan Ballot approval text was generated
2012-03-16
10 Cindy Morgan Ballot writeup was changed
2012-01-24
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] Position for Dan Romascanu has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-11-20
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-10.txt
2011-04-21
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-04-04
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot comment]
I have cleared
2011-04-04
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stewart Bryant has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-26
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] Position for Tim Polk has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-26
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2011-03-07
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
Updated based on -09.  I retained the numbering.

#5) Sec 5.4:  With regards to the 802.15.4 AES MAC based on AES.  The intro …
2011-02-07
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-09.txt
2010-12-12
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating my Discuss in step with the -08 revision of this document.

---

I have updated this Discuss to specifically catch …
2010-11-08
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-08.txt
2010-09-29
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I remain unhappy about the objective of this document within the IETF since it seems to be capturing requirements for routing in a …
2010-09-29
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I am updating my Discuss in step with the -07 revision of this document.

---

I am holding a Discuss until the Dimitri …
2010-08-05
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
This is an updated discuss.  I retained the numbering.

#1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS.  To be clear there's nothing for the authors to …
2010-08-04
10 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2010-08-04
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-07.txt
2010-05-21
10 (System) Removed from agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20
2010-05-20
10 Cindy Morgan State Changes to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation by Cindy Morgan
2010-05-20
10 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Jari Arkko
2010-05-20
10 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
1. I support the part of Adrian's DISCUSS concerning the need to coordinate and have this document reviewed by the ROLL WG. I …
2010-05-20
10 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Dan Romascanu
2010-05-20
10 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot discuss]
I agree with Adrian's DISCUSS.

I am particularly concerned with

"Here, 'Routing' is not equivalent to IP routing, but includes the functionalities of …
2010-05-20
10 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Stewart Bryant
2010-05-20
10 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
Is there an example of a power affluent node that is *not* mains-powered?  And does this have
any impact on the routing requirements?
2010-05-20
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot discuss]
(1) This document seems to assume that a LoWPAN will be either Route Over or Mesh Under in its
entirety.  This is not …
2010-05-20
10 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Ron Bonica
2010-05-20
10 Tim Polk [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Tim Polk
2010-05-20
10 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I have some significant concerns about this document. These cover
both process and techncial content.

---

These requirements have arrived very late in …
2010-05-20
10 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded by Adrian Farrel
2010-05-20
10 Tim Polk [Ballot comment]
2010-05-20
10 Tim Polk
[Ballot comment]
Please review the secdir review in its totality.  I realize this came in late, but I think there
are a number of comments …
2010-05-20
10 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Gonzalo Camarillo
2010-05-20
10 Lars Eggert
[Ballot comment]
I have a few questions:

Section 4., paragraph 15:
>        *  Classes of Service:
>          For …
2010-05-20
10 Lars Eggert [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Lars Eggert
2010-05-19
10 Ralph Droms State Changes to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Ralph Droms
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS.  To be clear there's nothing for the authors to do at this time.

The charter indicates that the …
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner [Ballot comment]
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) This is a DISCUSS-DISCUSS.  To be clear there's nothing for the authors to do at this time.

The charter indicates that the …
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to Discuss from No Objection by Sean Turner
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
I am debating whether to make this a DISCUSS:

Should this document discuss ways to mitigate the threats in RFC 4593 (Generic Threats …
2010-05-18
10 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Sean Turner
2010-05-16
10 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded by Russ Housley
2010-05-13
10 (System) State has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by system
2010-05-03
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2010-05-03
10 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Glen Zorn
2010-04-30
10 Ralph Droms Placed on agenda for telechat - 2010-05-20 by Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 Amanda Baber IANA comments:

As described in the IANA Considerations section, we understand this
document to have NO IANA Actions.
2010-04-29
10 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2010-04-29
10 Amy Vezza State Changes to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms Ballot has been issued by Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms Created "Approve" ballot
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms State Changes to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms Last Call was requested by Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-04-29
10 (System) Last call text was added
2010-04-29
10 (System) Ballot approval text was added
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms State Changes to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Ralph Droms
2010-04-29
10 Ralph Droms [Note]: 'Geoff Mulligan (geoff@proto6.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Ralph Droms
2010-04-13
10 Amy Vezza
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
  …
2010-04-13
10 Amy Vezza Draft Added by Amy Vezza in state Publication Requested
2010-04-13
10 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Geoff Mulligan (geoff@proto6.com) is the document shepherd.' added by Amy Vezza
2010-03-08
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-06.txt
2010-02-22
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-05.txt
2010-01-29
10 (System) Document has expired
2009-07-28
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-04.txt
2009-07-13
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-03.txt
2009-03-25
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-02.txt
2009-03-09
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-01.txt
2008-11-19
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-6lowpan-routing-requirements-00.txt