Diameter Base Protocol
RFC 6733

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
34 (System) Notify list changed from dime-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis@ietf.org to (None)
2012-10-26
34 (System) RFC published
2012-07-30
34 (System) IANA Action state changed to RFC-Ed-Ack from Waiting on RFC Editor
2012-07-26
34 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on RFC Editor from Waiting on Authors
2012-07-17
34 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-06-22
34 Glen Zorn New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-34.txt
2012-06-04
33 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress from Waiting on Authors
2012-05-21
33 (System) IANA Action state changed to Waiting on Authors from In Progress
2012-05-14
33 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-05-08
33 Benoît Claise Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-08
33 Benoît Claise Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-07
33 (System) IANA Action state changed to In Progress
2012-05-07
33 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2012-05-07
33 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-05-07
33 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-05-07
33 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-05-07
33 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-05-07
33 Benoît Claise State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-05-07
33 Glen Zorn New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-33.txt
2012-05-05
32 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing all of my comments. It seems you missed a few things in the conversion from "ABNF" to "CCF":

1.1.3 - ...
2012-05-05
32 Pete Resnick Ballot comment text updated for Pete Resnick
2012-04-30
32 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] Position for Sean Turner has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-04-20
32 Glen Zorn New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-32.txt
2012-03-31
31 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-03-29
31 Benoît Claise Responsible AD changed to Benoit Claise from Dan Romascanu
2012-03-29
31 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my concerns.
2012-03-29
31 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-29
31 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-03-12
31 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
Thank you for addressing my concerns about the IANA considerations. I have two other comments:

1. In Section 1.3.3, this specification has "[d]eprecated ...
2012-03-12
31 Peter Saint-Andre Ballot comment text updated for Peter Saint-Andre
2012-03-12
31 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] Position for Peter Saint-Andre has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-03-12
31 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
revised based on -31

#1) addressed

#2) addressed

#3) addressed

#4) addressed

#5) addressed

#6) addressed

#7) addressed

#8) addressed

#9) addressed

#10) ...
2012-03-12
31 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#18) s5.2: Name matching has proved to be a challenge for many in the TLS/DTLS environment.  A pointer to RFC 6125 would be ...
2012-03-12
31 Sean Turner Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Sean Turner
2012-03-11
31 Stephen Farrell [Ballot comment]

Since -31 says that Diameter MUST be used with one of TLS, DTLS or IPsec,
that clears my discuss. Thanks.
2012-03-11
31 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] Position for Stephen Farrell has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-03-11
31 Glen Zorn New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-31.txt
2012-03-08
30 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
(Updated for -30, removing what's been addressed - we're making progress in email on these last two - thanks!)

This sentence in section ...
2012-03-08
30 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]

In section 2, 2nd to last paragraph before section 2.1: This edit (moving
how tranparency is described) resulted in a sentence that says ...
2012-03-08
30 Robert Sparks Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Robert Sparks
2012-03-08
30 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.
(-30 is the same as -29 here so the point remains) ...
2012-03-08
30 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]

- The IPR declaration confuses me. RFC 3588 is dated September 2003.
The declaration says it relates to a filing from November 2003, ...
2012-03-08
30 Stephen Farrell Ballot comment and discuss text updated for Stephen Farrell
2012-03-08
30 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-03-08
30 Glen Zorn New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-30.txt
2011-09-22
29 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-22
29 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-09-22
29 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-22
29 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Amanda Baber
IANA has a question about the instructions in this document.

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are several
IANA Actions it must ...
2011-09-21
29 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
#1) s1, p 8: The following indentation seems to be off:

    In addition to addressing the above requirements, Diameter also
  ...
2011-09-21
29 Sean Turner
[Ballot discuss]
#1) I'm confused by the following two statements:

from abstract:

  The Diameter base protocol as defined in this document
  obsoletes RFC ...
2011-09-21
29 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
1. In Section 1.3.3, this specification has "[d]eprecated the exchange of CER/CEA messages in the open state" but "assume[s] that the capabilities exchange ...
2011-09-21
29 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot discuss]
RFC 3588 used DNS SRV Proto values of 'tcp' and 'sctp' for the SRV Service of 'diameter'. 3588bis seems to add two more ...
2011-09-21
29 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Overall - It took quite a while (I think until I was well into section 6) for me to figure out that the ...
2011-09-21
29 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-21
29 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-20
29 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
In section 1.3.1's second paragraph, starting the second sentence with
"Typically," is likely to introduce confusion about the allocation policy.
Why is the ...
2011-09-20
29 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The document reflects the change of the name of the Well-Known
IANA policy definition from "IETF Consensus" to "IETF Review", but
seems to ...
2011-09-20
29 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-19
29 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-17
29 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-15
29 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Hopefully this is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.

13.1 says that (D)TLS is now a MUST implement and IPsec ...
2011-09-15
29 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
- 5.2 says that "OIDs within...certificates" can be used to "signify
Diameter Server authorization" - have those been defined since 3588?
If so, ...
2011-09-15
29 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot discuss]
Hopefully is a no-brainer and just a simple clarification is needed.

13.1 says that (D)TLS is now a MUST implement and IPsec is ...
2011-09-15
29 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Dan Romascanu
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu Ballot has been issued
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu Created "Approve" ballot
2011-09-14
29 Dan Romascanu Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22
2011-09-13
29 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-08-30
29 Amy Vezza Last call sent
2011-08-30
29 Amy Vezza
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> ...
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation::AD Followup.
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu Last Call text changed
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu State changed to AD Evaluation::AD Followup from AD is watching::AD Followup.
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu Area acronym has been changed to ops from gen
2011-08-30
29 Dan Romascanu Last Call text changed
2011-08-30
29 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-29.txt
2011-08-25
28 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-28.txt
2011-08-22
27 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-27.txt
2011-07-29
29 (System) Document has expired
2011-07-29
29 (System) State changed to Dead from AD is watching::AD Followup.
2011-07-25
29 (System) Document has expired
2011-07-25
29 (System) State changed to Dead from AD is watching::AD Followup.
2011-06-15
29 Jouni Korhonen Submitted to IESG a while ago.
2011-06-15
29 Jouni Korhonen IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Document
2011-01-21
29 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Follow up from New Id Needed
2011-01-21
26 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-26.txt
2010-11-30
29 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR Completed. Reviewer: Carl Wallace.
2010-11-24
29 Dan Romascanu
State changed to AD is watching::Revised ID Needed from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
At IETF-79 the WG decided to include in this version of Diameter ...
2010-11-16
29 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2010-11-02
29 Cindy Morgan State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-11-02
29 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2010-11-02
29 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-29
29 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace
2010-10-29
29 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Carl Wallace
2010-10-29
29 Samuel Weiler Assignment of request for Last Call review by SECDIR to Barry Leiba was rejected
2010-10-26
29 Amy Vezza State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call by Amy Vezza
2010-10-22
29 Amanda Baber
IANA has a question about the IANA Actions related to this document.

In Section 11, the IANA Considerations section, there is significant
discussion of IANA ...
2010-10-14
29 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba
2010-10-14
29 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Barry Leiba
2010-10-11
29 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-10-11
29 Dan Romascanu Last Call was requested by Dan Romascanu
2010-10-11
29 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2010-10-11
29 (System) Last call text was added
2010-10-11
29 Dan Romascanu State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation by Dan Romascanu
2010-09-20
29 Cindy Morgan State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested by Cindy Morgan
2010-09-07
29 Jari Arkko Responsible AD has been changed to Dan Romascanu from Jari Arkko
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza [Note]: 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd' added by Amy Vezza
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza
(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
    ...
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza [Note]: changed to 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com) is the Document Shepherd' by Amy Vezza
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza [Note]: changed to 'Jouni Korhonen (jouni.korhonen@nsn.com, jouni.nospam@gmail.com)
         is the Document Shepherd' by Amy Vezza
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza Draft added in state Publication Requested by Amy Vezza
2010-09-03
29 Amy Vezza
[Note]: '(1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the
  ...
2010-09-02
25 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-25.txt
2010-08-26
24 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-24.txt
2010-08-05
23 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-23.txt
2010-08-04
22 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-22.txt
2010-06-02
21 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-21.txt
2010-04-15
20 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-20.txt
2009-09-02
19 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-19.txt
2009-07-10
18 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-18.txt
2009-05-06
17 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-17.txt
2009-03-06
16 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-16.txt
2008-12-11
15 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-15.txt
2008-11-24
14 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-14.txt
2008-11-02
13 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-13.txt
2008-09-08
12 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-12.txt
2008-07-09
11 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-11.txt
2008-01-22
10 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-10.txt
2007-11-16
09 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-09.txt
2007-10-04
08 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-08.txt
2007-09-10
07 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-07.txt
2007-08-22
06 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-06.txt
2007-07-08
05 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-05.txt
2007-06-05
04 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-04.txt
2007-04-02
03 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-03.txt
2007-03-05
02 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-02.txt
2007-01-31
01 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-01.txt
2006-12-12
00 (System) New version available: draft-ietf-dime-rfc3588bis-00.txt