Considerations for Having a Successful "Bar BOF" Side Meeting
RFC 6771

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14 09 (System) Notify list changed from lars@netapp.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com to (None)
2012-10-19 09 (System) RFC published
2012-09-06 09 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2012-09-04 09 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2012-09-04 09 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed
2012-09-04 09 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2012-09-04 09 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2012-09-04 09 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2012-08-31 09 Russ Housley Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-31 09 Russ Housley Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-31 09 Russ Housley Ballot writeup was changed
2012-08-31 09 Lars Eggert New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-09.txt
2012-08-30 08 Cindy Morgan State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed from IESG Evaluation
2012-08-29 08 Barry Leiba
[Ballot comment]
I agree with a number of the comments already made, particularly those by Wes, Ralph, and Jari.  I have nothing new to ...
2012-08-29 08 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-08-29 08 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
1. I'm in favor of moving away from the term "bar BOF".  The term, in
my opinion, has baggage in its ...
2012-08-29 08 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-08-29 08 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
I agree with Wes' and Sean's comments about inferring any level of support when an AD elects to attend (or not attend ...
2012-08-29 08 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-08-28 08 Ben Campbell Request for Telechat review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Ben Campbell.
2012-08-28 08 Lars Eggert New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-08.txt
2012-08-27 07 Robert Sparks
[Ballot comment]
The authors indicated they would make several changes based on last call comments (on -06) that are not reflected in this version. In ...
2012-08-27 07 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] Position for Robert Sparks has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-08-23 07 Jean Mahoney Request for Telechat review by GENART is assigned to Ben Campbell
2012-08-17 07 Russ Housley Notification list changed to : lars@netapp.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com
2012-08-17 07 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-08-30
2012-08-17 07 Russ Housley State changed to IESG Evaluation from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-08-17 07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot comment]
Thanks for addressing my Discuss.
I am please to support this document.
2012-08-17 07 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] Position for Adrian Farrel has been changed to Yes from Discuss
2012-08-16 07 (System) Sub state has been changed to AD Followup from Revised ID Needed
2012-08-16 07 Lars Eggert New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-07.txt
2011-09-22 06 Amy Vezza Removed from agenda for telechat
2011-09-22 06 Amy Vezza State changed to IESG Evaluation::Revised ID Needed from IESG Evaluation.
2011-09-22 06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
A horrible error on your otherwise excellent draft:

> Anecdotal evidence exists that at least one Area Director has not
> been able ...
2011-09-22 06 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot discuss]
I wanted to ballot "Yes" and move ahead with this document as a useful
piece of guidance. I certainly don't want to ...
2011-09-22 06 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-22 06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
1. I agree with Jari's points in his DISCUSS. The current document seems to be too negative about making of the IETF ...
2011-09-22 06 Dan Romascanu
[Ballot discuss]
1. I agree with Jari's points in his DISCUSS. The current document seems to be too negative about making of the IETF ...
2011-09-22 06 Dan Romascanu [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-22 06 Sean Turner
[Ballot comment]
1) I support Jari's comment #1.  I think people ought to be able to spam the community asking if there are ...
2011-09-22 06 Sean Turner [Ballot discuss]
In the IPR section does this change somewhat when an AD is present?
2011-09-22 06 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-22 06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot discuss]
A horrible error on your otherwise excellent draft:

> Anecdotal evidence exists that at least one Area Director has not
> been able ...
2011-09-22 06 Jari Arkko [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-22 06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
A horrible error on your otherwise excellent draft:

> Anecdotal evidence exists that at least one Area Director has not
> been able ...
2011-09-22 06 Jari Arkko
[Ballot comment]
A horrible error on your otherwise excellent draft:

> Anecdotal evidence exists that at least one Area Director has not
> been able ...
2011-09-21 06 Robert Sparks [Ballot comment]
The authors indicated they would make several changes based on last call comments (on -06), but that revision is not yet available.
2011-09-21 06 Robert Sparks
[Ballot discuss]
The list conversation on the "Applicability of IPR Rules" section does not appear to have concluded. I plan to move to YES on ...
2011-09-21 06 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded
2011-09-20 06 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, Recuse, has been recorded
2011-09-20 06 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-19 06 Stewart Bryant
[Ballot comment]
To comment on Stephen's comment about the use of the term "bar bof". The traditionalist in me prefers to retain that term ...
2011-09-19 06 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-15 06 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-12 06 Peter Saint-Andre
[Ballot comment]
I very much like this document.

I think it would be helpful to cite RFC 5434 as early as possible in the document ...
2011-09-12 06 Peter Saint-Andre [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-12 06 Stephen Farrell
[Ballot comment]
1) I'm not won over to the idea of discouraging the term "bar bof"
generally. I do think we should distinguish those ...
2011-09-12 06 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded
2011-09-11 06 Wesley Eddy
[Ballot comment]
It may be worthwhile to give some tips on inviting (or not inviting) area directors to your "side meeting" / bar-BOF.

It should say ...
2011-09-11 06 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded
2011-09-08 06 Russ Housley Placed on agenda for telechat - 2011-09-22
2011-09-08 06 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2011-09-08 06 Russ Housley Ballot has been issued
2011-09-08 06 Russ Housley Created "Approve" ballot
2011-09-08 06 Russ Housley State changed to IESG Evaluation from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.
2011-09-08 06 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call.
2011-09-07 06 Amanda Baber We understand that this document doesn't require any IANA actions.
2011-08-19 06 Samuel Weiler Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Joseph Salowey
2011-08-15 06 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-06.txt
2011-08-11 06 Cindy Morgan Last call sent
2011-08-11 06 Cindy Morgan
State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested.

The following Last Call Announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG
To: IETF-Announce
Reply-To: ietf ...
2011-08-11 06 Russ Housley Last Call was requested
2011-08-11 06 (System) Ballot writeup text was added
2011-08-11 06 (System) Last call text was added
2011-08-11 06 Russ Housley State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation.
2011-07-28 06 Russ Housley State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested.
2011-05-27 06 Russ Housley Ballot writeup text changed
2011-05-27 06 Russ Housley
  (1.a) Who is the Document Shepherd for this document? Has the
        Document Shepherd personally reviewed this version of the ...
2011-05-27 06 Russ Housley Draft added in state Publication Requested
2011-05-27 05 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-05.txt
2011-04-13 04 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-04.txt
2011-04-01 03 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-03.txt
2011-03-03 02 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-02.txt
2011-01-26 01 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-01.txt
2010-09-26 06 (System) Document has expired
2010-03-26 00 (System) New version available: draft-eggert-successful-bar-bof-00.txt