Problem Statement for Renumbering IPv6 Hosts with Static Addresses in Enterprise Networks
RFC 6866

Revision differences

Document history

Date Rev. By Action
2015-10-14
03 (System) Notify list changed from 6renum-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem@ietf.org to (None)
2013-02-27
03 (System) RFC published
2013-02-27
03 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48-DONE from AUTH48
2013-02-26
03 (System) RFC Editor state changed to AUTH48 from REF
2013-01-04
03 Amy Vezza State changed to RFC Ed Queue from Approved-announcement sent
2013-01-02
03 (System) IANA Action state changed to No IC
2013-01-02
03 Amy Vezza State changed to Approved-announcement sent from Approved-announcement to be sent
2013-01-02
03 Amy Vezza IESG has approved the document
2013-01-02
03 Amy Vezza Closed "Approve" ballot
2013-01-02
03 Amy Vezza Ballot approval text was generated
2013-01-02
03 Amy Vezza Ballot writeup was changed
2012-12-25
03 Ron Bonica State changed to Approved-announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation::AD Followup
2012-12-24
03 Pete Resnick
[Ballot comment]
Thanks for clarifying section 2.3 in response to my comments. I hope to see more of this discussion continue in the other ...
2012-12-24
03 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] Position for Pete Resnick has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-12-23
03 Brian Carpenter New version available: draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem-03.txt
2012-12-20
02 Tero Kivinen Closed request for Last Call review by SECDIR with state 'No Response'
2012-12-13
02 Cindy Morgan State changed to IESG Evaluation::AD Followup from Waiting for AD Go-Ahead
2012-12-13
02 Ralph Droms
[Ballot comment]
I'm entering Abstain for this document, because I think it has many
flaws, some important and some less important, but still may ...
2012-12-13
02 Ralph Droms [Ballot Position Update] New position, Abstain, has been recorded for Ralph Droms
2012-12-12
02 Wesley Eddy [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Wesley Eddy
2012-12-12
02 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] Position for Brian Haberman has been changed to No Objection from Discuss
2012-12-12
02 Robert Sparks [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Robert Sparks
2012-12-12
02 Stewart Bryant [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant
2012-12-12
02 Adrian Farrel
[Ballot comment]
I have no objection to the publication of this document. I have a
concern that the security considerations may need more work. For ...
2012-12-12
02 Adrian Farrel [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel
2012-12-12
02 Gonzalo Camarillo [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo
2012-12-12
02 (System) State changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead from In Last Call
2012-12-11
02 Pete Resnick
[Ballot discuss]
Section 2.3: I think this really needs to be expanded significantly. First of all, it is not larger sites that are the ...
2012-12-11
02 Pete Resnick [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Pete Resnick
2012-12-11
02 Benoît Claise [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise
2012-12-11
02 Brian Haberman
[Ballot discuss]
I fully support the publication of this document, but I do have one issue that I would like to discuss...

1. I don ...
2012-12-11
02 Brian Haberman
[Ballot comment]
1. In the introduction, shouldn't the list of reasons to use static addresses include their use within ACLs and other security mechanisms ...
2012-12-11
02 Brian Haberman [Ballot Position Update] New position, Discuss, has been recorded for Brian Haberman
2012-12-11
02 Pearl Liang
IANA has reviewed draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem-02, which is currently in Last Call, and has the following comments:

IANA understands that, upon approval of this document, there are ...
2012-12-11
02 Martin Stiemerling [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling
2012-12-10
02 Barry Leiba [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba
2012-12-10
02 Russ Housley [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Russ Housley
2012-12-10
02 Stephen Farrell [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell
2012-12-10
02 Sean Turner [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Sean Turner
2012-12-07
02 Alexey Melnikov Request for Last Call review by GENART Completed: Ready. Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov.
2012-12-07
02 Ron Bonica Placed on agenda for telechat - 2012-12-13
2012-12-07
02 Ron Bonica Ballot has been issued
2012-12-07
02 Ron Bonica [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Ronald Bonica
2012-12-07
02 Ron Bonica Created "Approve" ballot
2012-11-29
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-11-29
02 Jean Mahoney Request for Last Call review by GENART is assigned to Alexey Melnikov
2012-11-29
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý
2012-11-29
02 Tero Kivinen Request for Last Call review by SECDIR is assigned to Ondřej Surý
2012-11-28
02 Amy Vezza
The following Last Call announcement was sent out:

From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
CC: <renum@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf ...
2012-11-28
02 Amy Vezza State changed to In Last Call from Last Call Requested
2012-11-28
02 Ron Bonica Last call was requested
2012-11-28
02 Ron Bonica Ballot approval text was generated
2012-11-28
02 Ron Bonica State changed to Last Call Requested from AD Evaluation
2012-11-28
02 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-11-28
02 Ron Bonica Last call announcement was generated
2012-11-24
02 Ron Bonica State changed to AD Evaluation from Publication Requested
2012-11-16
02 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-11-16
02 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was changed
2012-11-13
02 Ron Bonica Ballot writeup was generated
2012-11-02
02 Cindy Morgan
(1) What type of RFC is being requested (BCP, Proposed Standard, Internet Standard, Informational, Experimental, or Historic)? Why is this the proper type of RFC ...
2012-11-02
02 Cindy Morgan Note added 'Lee Howard (lee.howard@twcable.com) is the document shepherd.'
2012-11-02
02 Cindy Morgan Intended Status changed to Informational
2012-11-02
02 Cindy Morgan IESG process started in state Publication Requested
2012-11-02
02 (System) Earlier history may be found in the Comment Log for draft-carpenter-6renum-static-problem
2012-11-02
02 Tim Chown IETF state changed to Submitted to IESG for Publication from WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up
2012-10-28
02 Tim Chown IETF state changed to WG Consensus: Waiting for Write-Up from WG Document
2012-09-30
02 Tim Chown Text has passed WGLC.
Chair (Lee) has written shepherd document.
Requesting publication as Informational RFC.
2012-09-30
02 Tim Chown WGLC passed, no outstanding issues.
Write-up has been drafted.
2012-09-30
02 Brian Carpenter New version available: draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem-02.txt
2012-08-30
01 Brian Carpenter New version available: draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem-01.txt
2012-07-30
00 Brian Carpenter New version available: draft-ietf-6renum-static-problem-00.txt