Skip to main content

Thing-to-Thing (t2trg)

RG Name Thing-to-Thing
Acronym t2trg
State Active
Charter charter-irtf-t2trg-01 Approved
Document dependencies
Additional resources GitHub Organization
Issue tracker
Wiki
Zulip stream
Personnel Chairs Ari Keränen, Carsten Bormann
Mailing list Address t2trg@irtf.org
To subscribe https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/t2trg
Archive https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/t2trg
Chat Room address https://zulip.ietf.org/#narrow/stream/t2trg

Charter for Research Group

The Thing-to-Thing Research Group (T2TRG) will investigate open research
issues in turning a true "Internet of Things" into reality, an Internet where
low-resource nodes ("things", "constrained nodes") can communicate among
themselves and with the wider Internet, in order to partake in permissionless
innovation. The focus of the T2TRG are on issues that touch opportunities for
standardization in the IETF, i.e., it will start at the adaptation layer
connecting devices to IP, and end at the application layer with architectures
and APIs for communicating and making data and management functions (including
security functions) available.

Motivation

A first wave of IoT standards has been completed by the IETF. Consortia are now
forming to build infrastructure and industry agreements around those. This
generates new requirements for research, based on actual usage of the standards
now available.

In parallel, W3C has set up an IG (Interest Group) on the Web of Things (WoT);
this is operating on a similar timeline as an RG does in the IRTF. A parallel
activity associated with the IETF/IRTF can help ensure the common work does not
stop at the traditional boundaries of the W3C, but considers networking issues
as well. IETF WGs are also active on these topics, but an IRTF RG can provide a
more long-term perspective to the collaboration.

Areas of Interest

A number of areas of interest have been identified:

  • Understanding the motivation for single-purpose silos and gateways;
    facilitating a move towards small pieces loosely joined (hence
    "thing-to-thing"); enabling scaling the number of applications in a single
    network
  • Deployment considerations; scaling considerations; cost of ownership
  • Management and operation of "things"
  • Lifecycle aspects (including, but not limited to, security considerations)
  • Cooperation with W3C, e.g., on data models, formats, and semantics

More exploratory areas of interest include:

  • Operating "things" that have multiple masters/stakeholders (including
    understanding role definitions of devices, owners, operators, etc.)
  • Exploring the duality of state- and event-based approaches
  • Aspects of distribution (cf. "fog computing"); reliability and scalability
    considerations
  • Containerization and other forms of mobile code

Other Objectives

Besides facilitating communication between researchers in its areas of
interest, T2TRG pursues a number of additional objectives:

  • Definition of "benchmark" or "reference" environments:
    • to enable regular plugfests, and
    • as a basis for repeatable, comparable research.
  • Description of practical, real world, cross domain applications of
    connected "things"
  • Taxonomy, technology survey, and best practice documents
  • Fostering collaboration with industry fora and other organizations on
    networking of "things"

These objectives will be achieved making use of a close involvement between the
IETF community and the T2TRG. For the IETF, some RG documents may simplify the
generation of (or even serve as) use case documents or other informational
references. Close contact will be maintained with the IETF's IoT-related WGs
and its IoT directorate, as well as related IRTF research groups.

Name and Organization

In the context of this RG, thing refers to a connected object that is also
defined by its interface to the physical world. Some "things" may be connected
only using a local interconnect, but the RG's focus is on "things" that are
part of the Internet. Not all "things" are highly constrained, but IoT
architectures generally need to enable the inclusion of constrained nodes.

The Thing-to-Thing Research Group plays on a reminiscence to the End-to-End
Research Group (END2END), which accompanied the evolution of the Internet for
its first three decades. (The T2TRG is certainly not intended to literally
exclude the communication of constrained nodes with the wider Internet or with
more than one other constrained node.)

The charter of the END2END RG mentioned that "the specific topics of interest
(...) have changed as network research has advanced, but it is generally
concerned with end-to-end services and protocols implemented in hosts" – a
focus similar to that of the T2TRG, except that the concern for packet
forwarding and network building may be closer to a constrained node than it was
to a traditional Internet host.

Also, T2TRG will not be a closed RG, but employ an open membership policy
towards all interested researchers, taking its clues from the way that, say,
the DTNRG or the ICNRG have been and are being run.

Meetings

Meetings will often take place co-located with IETF meetings, and/or with
meetings of related organizations such as W3C WoT IG. Organizing Workshops at
research conferences is also envisioned.

Specific meetings of the T2TRG will pick focus items that much of the
discussion of the meeting should revolve around. The stated focus for the
initial meetings was on three immediate areas of interest:

  • Management and Operation of networks involving constrained nodes
  • Security and Lifecycle aspects in constrained nodes
  • REST and pub/sub: Exploring the state-event duality

Future work items may include:

  • Documents
    • Guidance for designing REST-based IoT Applications ("cookbook")
    • Security considerations for the IoT
    • A survey of security bootstrapping approaches
  • Activities
    • Preparing and running "plugRESTs" (with support from the documents
      above, in cooperation with the W3C IG WoT; preparing work on reference
      and evaluation frameworks), eventually leading to:
      • plugRESTs: lessons learned