DTLS In Constrained Environments
charter-ietf-dice-01
Yes
(Barry Leiba)
(Jari Arkko)
(Sean Turner)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Stephen Farrell)
(Ted Lemon)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Brian Haberman)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Stewart Bryant)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-04 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Ted Lemon Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Benoît Claise Former IESG member
(was Block)
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-26 for -00-05)
Unknown
Thanks for addressing my BLOCK. I always prefer when the proposed milestones (document, intended status, and target dates) are populated. It helps the work assessment and review. Important note: the milestones are not part of the charter text, which is THE contract between the IESG and the WG. Since we don't have consensus on this topic within the IESG, it's just a nice-to-have, and up to the responsible AD ...
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown
Pete Resnick Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2013-09-25 for -00-04)
Unknown
Small suggestions that I hope are non-controversial:
- The first two tasks sound like the protocol work. It seems to me that the 5th paragraph ("The DTLS state machine should not be modified...") belongs between the second and third task, since it doesn't really apply to the third task. You might even start the sentence, "With regard to the above two items of protocol work, the DTLS state machine...".
- I take the third task to involve writing a report on the findings of the "investigation". I think simply ending the first sentence with "and report on those findings" would be sufficient.
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(for -00-04)
Unknown