Token Binding

Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-03 and is now closed.

Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"

Spencer Dawkins Yes

Comment (2015-03-03 for -00-03)
No email
send info
I like that you're doing this, and I like short and clear charters. Thank you.

I'm looking at these two no-particular-order goals in the charter:

5. Make the Token Binding protocol useable in combination with a variety of
application protocols.
6. Allow the negotiation of the Token Binding protocol without additional

and I'm looking at, which uses ALPN to accomplish these goals, which seems very reasonable.

Is there a reason the charter goals are written more broadly than the starting-point draft requires? 

Would mentioning ALPN in the charter explicitly be worth doing?

(Stephen Farrell) Yes

(Barry Leiba) Yes

(Kathleen Moriarty) Yes

(Jari Arkko) No Objection

(Alia Atlas) No Objection

(Richard Barnes) No Objection

Comment (2015-03-04 for -00-03)
No email
send info
+1 to Spencer's inclination for tighter scoping.

(Benoît Claise) No Objection

(Adrian Farrel) No Objection

(Brian Haberman) No Objection

(Joel Jaeggli) No Objection

(Ted Lemon) No Objection

(Pete Resnick) No Objection

(Martin Stiemerling) No Objection