Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00-03 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Do we approve of this charter?"
# Internet AD comments for charter-ietf-vcon-00-03 CC @ekline * comment syntax: - https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md ## Nits ### "Out of Scope" * "It is expected that JOSE or other..." This is not really a bullet point under "out of scope". Suggest: de-bullet, de-indent, and clarify "provides sufficient security context" (or whatever reads best).
Does vCon stand for anything? If so, it would be kind of nice to mention that somewhere. If not, respect for not giving in to the pressure to backronym it, but it might be nice to mention that, too. One example of a working group whose name isn't an acronym is babel, in RTG. The full name of the working group in datatracker is "babel routing protocol", which while not super descriptive, is at least better than having it just be "babel". For the present WG, right now we have "vcon ... vCon" which is not very helpful.
Thank you for adding the privacy considerations in the charter.