IETF conflict review for draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc
conflict-review-gieben-pandoc2rfc-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-06-16
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc-03 The IESG has completed a review of draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc-03 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Writing I-Ds and RFCs using Pandoc and a bit of XML' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-gieben-pandoc2rfc/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gieben-pandoc2rfc/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2014-06-16
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2014-06-16
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-06-16
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-06-12
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | New version available: conflict-review-gieben-pandoc2rfc-00.txt |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Shepherding AD changed to Barry Leiba |
2014-06-11
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2014-06-10
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-06-12 |
2014-06-09
|
00 | Nevil Brownlee | IETF conflict review requested |