IETF conflict review for draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri
conflict-review-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-00
Document history
Date | Rev. | By | Action |
---|---|---|---|
2014-01-27
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-06 The IESG has completed a review of draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-06 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'ENUM Service Registration for acct URI' as an Experimental RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
2014-01-27
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
2014-01-27
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
2014-01-27
|
00 | Amy Vezza | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
2014-01-23
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
2014-01-23
|
00 | Gonzalo Camarillo | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Gonzalo Camarillo |
2014-01-23
|
00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
2014-01-23
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Amanda Baber | The IESG-designated expert for Enumservices has approved the registration proposal in version 06 of this document. |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] I'm curious: given the file-name, was this proposed to and rejected by appsawg? As a personal comment, I don't think its at all … [Ballot comment] I'm curious: given the file-name, was this proposed to and rejected by appsawg? As a personal comment, I don't think its at all a good plan to introduce yet more linkages between personal identifiers which is precisely what this does. But that's for the ISE to judge I guess. I'm also not quite sure whether or not this draft does what's called for in the security considerations of draft-ietf-appsawg-acct-uri. But that's also for the ISE to judge. I'm pretty sure this draft does not define the security considerations fully, but I'm not sure if this draft counts as a protocol making "use" of acct URIs. (Were it up to me, I'd say yes it is, and that the security considerations ought be more thorough.) In addition, protocols that make use of 'acct' URIs are responsible for defining security considerations related to such usage, e.g., the risks involved in dereferencing an 'acct' URI, the authentication and authorization methods that could be used to control access to personal data associated with a user's account at a service, and methods for ensuring the confidentiality of such information. I also note that 6117 says: However, in some cases, the inclusion of those protocols and URI Schemes into ENUM specifically could introduce new security issues. In these cases, those issues or risks MUST be covered in the "Security Considerations" section of the Enumservice Specification. Authors should pay particular attention to any indirect risks that are associated with a proposed Enumservice, including cases where the proposed Enumservice could lead to the discovery or disclosure of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). If someone were to ask me, I'd say that this draft doesn't fully cover that, but again that's for the ISE and relevant designated expert to decide. |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Benoît Claise | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Benoit Claise |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Amanda Baber | IANA is asking the IESG-designated expert for Enumservices to review the registration. |
2014-01-22
|
00 | Stewart Bryant | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stewart Bryant |
2014-01-21
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
2014-01-21
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
2014-01-21
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
2014-01-21
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | New version available: conflict-review-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-00.txt |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Shepherding AD changed to Barry Leiba |
2014-01-20
|
00 | Barry Leiba | State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
2014-01-14
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | The draft draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-06 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The … The draft draft-goix-appsawg-enum-acct-uri-06 is ready for publication from the Independent Stream. Please ask IESG to review it, as set out in RFC 5742. The following is some background for this draft, please forward it to IESG along with this request ... Its title is: ENUM Service Registration for acct URI Its abstract says: "This document registers a Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) service for 'acct:' URIs (Uniform Resource Identifiers)." It was reviewed for me by Richard Shockey andLawrence Conroy. It has IANA Considerations as follows: This document requests the IANA registration of the Enumservice with Type "acct" according to the definitions in this document, [RFC6116] and [RFC6117]. I asked IANA to look at it, they asked Bernie Hoeneisen (Designated Expert for the ENUM registry) to review it; Bernie has worked with the draft authors to improve it, he has now approved it. Thanks, Nevil (ISE) |
2014-01-14
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-01-23 |
2014-01-14
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | IETF conflict review requested |