IETF conflict review for draft-seantek-windows-image
conflict-review-seantek-windows-image-00
Yes
(Ben Campbell)
No Objection
(Alia Atlas)
(Alvaro Retana)
(Brian Haberman)
(Deborah Brungard)
(Jari Arkko)
(Joel Jaeggli)
(Martin Stiemerling)
(Spencer Dawkins)
(Terry Manderson)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 00 and is now closed.
Ballot question: "Is this the correct conflict review response?"
Barry Leiba Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2016-03-13)
Unknown
For Standards-Tree registration in the Independent Stream, the IESG has to explicitly approve the registration requests. In this case, I would like to make that approval contingent upon approval by the media-types experts, which I have not yet seen. I (or my successor) will put a management item on a telechat to make that approval only after the ISE or IANA gets the OK from the DEs. I don't imagine that that will be much of a problem, though it might entail some document revisions. Sean did start some discussion of this on the media-types list, but it was a long time ago (October 2014), and did not end in resolution.
Ben Campbell Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Alia Atlas Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Alvaro Retana Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Brian Haberman Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Deborah Brungard Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Jari Arkko Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Joel Jaeggli Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Martin Stiemerling Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Spencer Dawkins Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stephen Farrell Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2016-03-17)
Unknown
- Barry's comment confuses me. I don't see why we're binding together an ISE document with later IESG approval of media-types. Are we being perhaps too process-clever here? The downside here is I'm not sure what I'm being asked about nor if I like predicting that the DE won't think there's an issue with these. What happens if the IESG approve this now but issues turn up later? - It seems odd that nobody from msft appears to be involved here. I hope they don't mind that Sean is doing their archaeology for them. - Thanks for the mention of MICE! I wondered if you'd cover that and it is definitely noteworthy. The other security considerations also seem to me to be noticeably better than is normal for such registrations. Good job!
Terry Manderson Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown