IETF conflict review for draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel
conflict-review-zeilenga-email-seclabel-00
Document history
| Date | Rev. | By | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2014-09-22
|
00 | Amy Vezza | The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for … The following approval message was sent From: The IESG To: "Nevil Brownlee" , draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel@tools.ietf.org Cc: The IESG , , Subject: Results of IETF-conflict review for draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel-08 The IESG has completed a review of draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel-08 consistent with RFC5742. The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Security Labels in Internet Email' as an Informational RFC. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this document and IETF work. The IESG would also like the RFC-Editor to review the comments in the datatracker related to this document and determine whether or not they merit incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot and the history log. The IESG review is documented at: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/conflict-review-zeilenga-email-seclabel/ A URL of the reviewed Internet Draft is: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zeilenga-email-seclabel/ The process for such documents is described at http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html Thank you, The IESG Secretary |
|
2014-09-22
|
00 | Amy Vezza | IESG has approved the conflict review response |
|
2014-09-22
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Closed "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-09-22
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement sent from Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent |
|
2014-09-18
|
00 | Cindy Morgan | Conflict Review State changed to Approved No Problem - announcement to be sent from IESG Evaluation |
|
2014-09-18
|
00 | Ted Lemon | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Ted Lemon |
|
2014-09-17
|
00 | Richard Barnes | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Richard Barnes |
|
2014-09-17
|
00 | Alia Atlas | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alia Atlas |
|
2014-09-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot comment] - Is it appropriate for the authors to "hope" a standard will help in an ISE RFC? (last para of 1.2) I don't … [Ballot comment] - Is it appropriate for the authors to "hope" a standard will help in an ISE RFC? (last para of 1.2) I don't care much, as their hopes are for them to figure out, but it seems like an odd statement here. - section 4: It'd be good to provide the XML for the ":xml" example as well as the b64 for it |
|
2014-09-17
|
00 | Stephen Farrell | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Stephen Farrell |
|
2014-09-17
|
00 | Jari Arkko | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Jari Arkko |
|
2014-09-16
|
00 | Alissa Cooper | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Alissa Cooper |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Joel Jaeggli | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Joel Jaeggli |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Martin Stiemerling | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Martin Stiemerling |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Pete Resnick | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Pete Resnick |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Adrian Farrel | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Adrian Farrel |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot comment] I'm fine with this and don't have an objection. The editors may want to follow along with the endymail@ietf.org discussion list. Questions are … [Ballot comment] I'm fine with this and don't have an objection. The editors may want to follow along with the endymail@ietf.org discussion list. Questions are being raised as to why we have subjects exposed as we do since they sometime contain sensitive data. Having this marker in the subject will make it apparent that the message contain sensitive information. Maybe there is a better way to do this going forward depending on how messaging evolves. |
|
2014-09-15
|
00 | Kathleen Moriarty | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Kathleen Moriarty |
|
2014-09-08
|
00 | Brian Haberman | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Brian Haberman |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Spencer Dawkins | [Ballot Position Update] New position, No Objection, has been recorded for Spencer Dawkins |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | [Ballot Position Update] New position, Yes, has been recorded for Barry Leiba |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Created "Approve" ballot |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Conflict Review State changed to IESG Evaluation from AD Review |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | New version available: conflict-review-zeilenga-email-seclabel-00.txt |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Removed telechat returning item indication |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Telechat date has been changed to 2014-09-18 from 2014-09-04 |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Conflict Review State changed to AD Review from Needs Shepherd |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Barry Leiba | Shepherding AD changed to Barry Leiba |
|
2014-09-02
|
00 | Amy Vezza | Placed on agenda for telechat - 2014-09-04 |
|
2014-08-31
|
00 | Nevil Brownlee | IETF conflict review requested |