Practical Considerations and Implementation Experiences in Securing Smart Object Networks
draft-aks-lwig-crypto-sensors-00
| Document | Type |
This is an older version of an Internet-Draft whose latest revision state is "Replaced".
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Mohit Sethi , Jari Arkko , Ari Keränen , Heidi-Maria Back | ||
| Last updated | 2016-04-09 (Latest revision 2015-10-07) | ||
| Replaces | draft-aks-crypto-sensors | ||
| Replaced by | draft-ietf-lwig-crypto-sensors | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This memo describes challenges associated with securing smart object devices in constrained implementations and environments. The memo describes a possible deployment model suitable for these environments, discusses the availability of cryptographic libraries for small devices, presents some preliminary experiences in implementing small devices using those libraries, and discusses trade-offs involving different types of approaches.
Authors
Mohit Sethi
Jari Arkko
Ari Keränen
Heidi-Maria Back
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)