Skip to main content

Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) extension for recording TE Metric of a Label Switched Path
draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Authors Zafar Ali , George Swallow , Clarence Filsfils , Matt Hartley , Kenji Kumaki , Ruediger Kunze
Last updated 2013-02-13 (Latest revision 2012-10-22)
Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-ccamp-te-metric-recording
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:

Abstract

There are many scenarios in which Traffic Engineering (TE) metrics such as cost, latency and latency variation associated with a Forwarding Adjacency (FA) or Routing Adjacency (RA) Label Switched Path (LSP) are not available to the ingress and egress nodes. This draft provides extensions for the Resource ReserVation Protocol- Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) for the support of the discovery of cost, latency and latency variation of an LSP.

Authors

Zafar Ali
George Swallow
Clarence Filsfils
Matt Hartley
Kenji Kumaki
Ruediger Kunze

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)