Discussion of Congestion Marking with RT-ECN
draft-babiarz-rtecn-marking-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Jozef Babiarz | ||
| Last updated | 2005-07-13 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
At the 62nd IETF meeting, it was requested that the authors of Congestion Notification Process for Real-Time Traffic (RT-ECN) draft look at rate proportional marking as an method of indicating that traffic has exceeded a configured rate. In version 03 of RT-ECN draft (draft-babiarz-tsvwg-rtecn-03) we stated, when the rate exceeds the engineered traffic level, all packets as indicated by a DS codepoint from ECN-capable end-systems are marked to indicate congestion for the duration of the experienced congestion. In this memo, we looked at the two approaches, provide analysis as well our conclusions.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)