The Hash Convention For Mail System Status Codes (HCMSSC)
draft-bernstein-hcmssc-05
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | D. J. Bernstein | ||
| Last updated | 1997-02-03 (Latest revision 1998-08-14) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
RFC 1893 defines codes for mail delivery failures. For example, code 5.1.1 means that the specified mailbox does not exist. The qmail package sprays these codes all over the place, by adding a code to the text of every error message, preceded by a hash mark and surrounded by parentheses. It avoids using hash marks elsewhere.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)