An Idea for an Alternate IETF Standards Track
draft-bradner-ietf-stds-trk-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Scott O. Bradner | ||
| Last updated | 2004-03-26 | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
The discussion in the problem working group reached consensus that the current IETF 3-stage standards track, as implemented, is not working. This is a proposal for an alternate, also 3-stage, standards track that I feel better matches current reality. This is a republication of an ID originally published in June 2003
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)