Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim
draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040bis-01
| Document | Type | Replaced Internet-Draft (tsvwg WG) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Last updated | 2016-08-08 (latest revision 2016-07-08) | ||
| Replaced by | draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim | ||
| Stream | IETF | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
| Document shepherd | No shepherd assigned | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of
the expired Internet-Draft can be found at
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040bis-01.txt
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040bis-01.txt
Abstract
RFC 6040 on "Tunnelling of Explicit Congestion Notification" made the rules for propagation of ECN consistent for all forms of IP in IP tunnel. This specification extends the scope of RFC 6040 to include tunnels where two IP headers are separated by a shim header that cannot stand alone.
Authors
Bob Briscoe (ietf@bobbriscoe.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)