Propagating Explicit Congestion Notification Across IP Tunnel Headers Separated by a Shim
draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040bis-01
Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(tsvwg WG)
Expired & archived
|
|
---|---|---|---|
Author | Bob Briscoe | ||
Last updated | 2016-08-08 (Latest revision 2016-07-08) | ||
Replaced by | draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim, draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim | ||
RFC stream | Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) | ||
Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
Formats | |||
Additional resources | Mailing list discussion | ||
Stream | WG state | Adopted by a WG | |
Document shepherd | (None) | ||
IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim, draft-briscoe-tsvwg-rfc6040update-shim | |
Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
Telechat date | (None) | ||
Responsible AD | (None) | ||
Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
RFC 6040 on "Tunnelling of Explicit Congestion Notification" made the rules for propagation of ECN consistent for all forms of IP in IP tunnel. This specification extends the scope of RFC 6040 to include tunnels where two IP headers are separated by a shim header that cannot stand alone.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)