The Big Data Approach for Multipoint Alternate Marking method
draft-c2f-ippm-big-data-alt-mark-00
|
| Document |
Type |
|
Active Internet-Draft (individual)
|
|
Last updated |
|
2020-03-09
|
|
Stream |
|
(None)
|
|
Intended RFC status |
|
(None)
|
|
Formats |
|
plain text
pdf
htmlized
bibtex
|
| Stream |
Stream state |
|
(No stream defined) |
|
Consensus Boilerplate |
|
Unknown
|
|
RFC Editor Note |
|
(None)
|
| IESG |
IESG state |
|
I-D Exists
|
|
Telechat date |
|
|
|
Responsible AD |
|
(None)
|
|
Send notices to |
|
(None)
|
IPPM Working Group M. Cociglio
Internet-Draft Telecom Italia
Intended status: Experimental C. Corbo
Expires: September 10, 2020 Politecnico di Torino
G. Fioccola
Huawei Technologies
M. Nilo
Telecom Italia
R. Sisto
Politecnico di Torino
March 9, 2020
The Big Data Approach for Multipoint Alternate Marking method
draft-c2f-ippm-big-data-alt-mark-00
Abstract
This document introduces a new approach for the Alternate Marking
method. It is called Big Data Multipoint Alternate Marking method
and, starting from the methodology described in RFC 8321 and draft-
ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark, it explains how to implement
performance measurement analytics on the Network Management System by
analysing the raw data of the network nodes.
Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on September 10, 2020.
Cociglio, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft Big Data Multipoint AM March 2020
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Scenario and Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1. Data collecting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.2. Sending data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.3. Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.4. Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
4. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
5. Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
7.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1. Introduction
This document describes a scenario and a methodology that can be used
to get performance details from a monitored network. The approach is
inspired by the concepts illustrated in the Alternate Marking Method
(RFC 8321 [RFC8321]), Multipoint Alternate Marking Method
([I-D.ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark]), and Hash Sampling (RFC 5474
[RFC5474] and RFC 5475 [RFC5475]).
In general the performance measurement results are based on a
posteriori calculation and the method is called Big Data Multipoint
Alternate Marking performance measurement.
The kinds of measurements are specified on the Network Management
System (NMS) and they can be split into two main categories: per
cluster and end-to-end.
Cociglio, et al. Expires September 10, 2020 [Page 2]
Show full document text