The Big Data Approach for Multipoint Alternate Marking method
draft-c2f-ippm-big-data-alt-mark-00

Document Type Active Internet-Draft (individual)
Last updated 2020-03-09
Stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Formats plain text pdf htmlized bibtex
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus Boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state I-D Exists
Telechat date
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)
IPPM Working Group                                           M. Cociglio
Internet-Draft                                            Telecom Italia
Intended status: Experimental                                   C. Corbo
Expires: September 10, 2020                        Politecnico di Torino
                                                             G. Fioccola
                                                     Huawei Technologies
                                                                 M. Nilo
                                                          Telecom Italia
                                                                R. Sisto
                                                   Politecnico di Torino
                                                           March 9, 2020

     The Big Data Approach for Multipoint Alternate Marking method
                  draft-c2f-ippm-big-data-alt-mark-00

Abstract

   This document introduces a new approach for the Alternate Marking
   method.  It is called Big Data Multipoint Alternate Marking method
   and, starting from the methodology described in RFC 8321 and draft-
   ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark, it explains how to implement
   performance measurement analytics on the Network Management System by
   analysing the raw data of the network nodes.

Requirements Language

   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Status of This Memo

   This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
   provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
   Task Force (IETF).  Note that other groups may also distribute
   working documents as Internet-Drafts.  The list of current Internet-
   Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

   Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
   and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
   time.  It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
   material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

   This Internet-Draft will expire on September 10, 2020.

Cociglio, et al.       Expires September 10, 2020               [Page 1]
Internet-Draft           Big Data Multipoint AM               March 2020

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  Scenario and Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
   3.  Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.1.  Data collecting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
     3.2.  Sending data  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.3.  Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
     3.4.  Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7
   4.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   5.  Acknowledgements  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   6.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   7.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     7.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
     7.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  10

1.  Introduction

   This document describes a scenario and a methodology that can be used
   to get performance details from a monitored network.  The approach is
   inspired by the concepts illustrated in the Alternate Marking Method
   (RFC 8321 [RFC8321]), Multipoint Alternate Marking Method
   ([I-D.ietf-ippm-multipoint-alt-mark]), and Hash Sampling (RFC 5474
   [RFC5474] and RFC 5475 [RFC5475]).

   In general the performance measurement results are based on a
   posteriori calculation and the method is called Big Data Multipoint
   Alternate Marking performance measurement.

   The kinds of measurements are specified on the Network Management
   System (NMS) and they can be split into two main categories: per
   cluster and end-to-end.

Cociglio, et al.       Expires September 10, 2020               [Page 2]
Show full document text