Auto-Configuration Extention in Virtual Aggregation
draft-cheng-grow-va-auto-extensions-00
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Li Cheng , Jun Wang | ||
| Last updated | 2012-03-26 (Latest revision 2011-09-06) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
Auto-Configuration in Virtual Aggregation as specified in [I-D.ietf-grow-va-auto] requires configuration of a "VP-range list" in ASBRs connected to transit and peer ISPs. These ASBRs simply tag some routes whose prefix falls within the VP-Range with a "can- suppress" tag to indicate whether these routes should be FIB installed. This draft specified an extended auto-configuration mechanism in Virtual Aggregation to support the configuration of both "VP-List" and "popular prefixes". Specifically, based on this mechanism, the ratio of lost packets when VP routes fail could be minimized.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)