Extension to LISP NAT Traversal Proposal
draft-cheng-lisp-nat-traversal-extension-01
| Document | Type |
Expired Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Li Cheng , Jun Wang | ||
| Last updated | 2014-01-16 (Latest revision 2013-07-15) | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This draft specifies several special NAT traversal scenarios when two or more LISP Sites/MNs which locate behind the same NAT equipment communicate with each other. When these LISP Sites/MNs communicate with each other, it may cause routing latency and will increase re- encapsulation load on Re-encapsulating Tunnel Routers(RTRs) based on existing LISP-NAT strategy. In this draft, we give detail descriptions of these scenarios. Also we propose some suggestions to solve the problems. According to our strategy, a new kind of message is used for RTRs to send relative information of Corresponding Sites/MNs to xTRs.
Authors
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)