PCEP Extensions for MPLS-TE LSP protection with stateful PCE
draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-protection-00
| Document | Type | Expired Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Edward Crabbe , Jan Medved , Ina Minei , Raveendra Torvi | ||
| Last updated | 2013-04-15 (latest revision 2012-10-12) | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats |
Expired & archived
pdf
htmlized (tools)
htmlized
bibtex
|
||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus Boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Expired | |
| Telechat date | |||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) | ||
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-crabbe-pce-stateful-pce-protection-00.txt
Abstract
Stateful PCE [I-D.ietf-pce-stateful-pce] can apply global concurrent optimizations to optimize LSP placement. In a deployment where a PCE is used to compute all the paths, it may be beneficial for the protection paths to also be computed by the PCE. This document defines extensions needed for the setup and management of MPLS-TE protection paths by the PCE.
Authors
Edward Crabbe
(edc@google.com)
Jan Medved
(jmedved@cisco.com)
Ina Minei
(ina@juniper.net)
Raveendra Torvi
(rtorvi@juniper.net)
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)