Use of SRV Records for Locating Email Submission/Access Services
draft-daboo-srv-email-05
Yes
(Alexey Melnikov)
No Objection
(Adrian Farrel)
(Dan Romascanu)
(Gonzalo Camarillo)
(Robert Sparks)
(Ron Bonica)
(Russ Housley)
(Sean Turner)
Note: This ballot was opened for revision 05 and is now closed.
Alexey Melnikov Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
()
Unknown
Peter Saint-Andre Former IESG member
Yes
Yes
(2010-05-03)
Unknown
In Section 3.4, I suggest changing "lower priority value" to "smaller priority value" so that implementers are not confused by the fact that the "preferred" service has a "lower" priority. (In RFC 2782 this is called the "lowest-numbered priority".)
Adrian Farrel Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Dan Romascanu Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
David Harrington Former IESG member
(was Discuss, No Objection, Discuss, No Objection)
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-06-16)
Unknown
in section 6, "transport layer security" is a MUST; is this TLS, and if so, then should there be a reference to the TLS standard? or is any transport layer security mechanism good enough to meet the MUST?
Gonzalo Camarillo Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Robert Sparks Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Ron Bonica Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Russ Housley Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Sean Turner Former IESG member
(was Discuss)
No Objection
No Objection
()
Unknown
Stewart Bryant Former IESG member
No Objection
No Objection
(2010-05-06)
Unknown
There seems to be no definition of SRV in the draft, nor is it immediately apparent in the draft which reference to look up to find the definition.