Binary Application Record Encoding (BARE)
draft-devault-bare-07
| Document | Type | Active Internet-Draft (individual) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Author | Drew DeVault | ||
| Last updated | 2022-05-11 | ||
| Stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | I-D Exists | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
draft-devault-bare-07
Internet Engineering Task Force D. DeVault
Internet-Draft SourceHut
Intended status: Informational 11 May 2022
Expires: 12 November 2022
Binary Application Record Encoding (BARE)
draft-devault-bare-07
Abstract
The Binary Application Record Encoding (BARE) is a data format used
to represent application records for storage or transmission between
programs. BARE messages are concise and have a well-defined schema,
and implementations may be simple and broadly compatible. A schema
language is also provided to express message schemas out-of-band.
Comments
Comments are solicited and should be addressed to the mailing list at
~sircmpwn/public-inbox@lists.sr.ht and/or the author(s).
Status of This Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on 12 November 2022.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2022 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/
license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document.
Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights
and restrictions with respect to this document.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1. Requirements Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.2. Use-cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Specification of the BARE Message Encoding . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1. Primitive Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2. Aggregate Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.3. User-Defined Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.4. Invariants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3. BARE Schema Language Specification . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1. Lexical Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.2. ABNF Grammar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3. Semantic Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
4. Application Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5. Future Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
8. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Appendix A. Example Values . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Appendix B. Example Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
B.1. Message Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
B.2. Encoded Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Appendix C. Complex Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
C.1. Simple Hierarchical Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
C.2. JSON Schema . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
C.3. Graph . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Appendix D. Design Decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
1. Introduction
The purpose of the BARE message encoding, like hundreds of others, is
to encode application messages. The goals of such encodings vary
(leading to their proliferation); BARE's goals are the following:
* Concise messages
* A well-defined message schema
* Broad compatibility with programming environments
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
* Simplicity of implementation
This document specifies the BARE message encoding, as well as a
schema language that may be used to describe the layout of a BARE
message. The schema of a message must be agreed upon in advance by
each party exchanging a BARE message; message structure is not
encoded into the representation. The schema language is useful for
this purpose but not required.
1.1. Requirements Language
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP
14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
1.2. Use-cases
The goals of a concise, binary, strongly-typed, and broadly-
compatible structured message encoding format support a broad number
of use-cases. Examples include:
* Self-describing authentication tokens for web services
* Opaque messages for transmitting arbitrary state between unrelated
internet services
* A representation for packets in an internet protocol
* A structured data format for encrypted or signed application
messages
* A structured data format for storing data in persistent storage
The conciseness of a BARE-encoded message enables representing
structured data under strict limitations on message length in a large
variety of contexts. The simple binary format may also be easily
paired with additional tools, such as plain-text encodings,
compression, or cryptography algorithms, as demanded by the
application's needs, without increasing the complexity of the message
encoding. A BARE message has a comparable size and entropy to the
underlying state it represents.
The BARE schema language also provides a means of describing the
format of BARE messages without implementation-specific details.
This encourages applications that utilize BARE to describe their
state in a manner that other programmers can easily utilize for
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
application interoperation. The conservative set of primitives
offered by BARE aids in making such new implementations easy to
write.
2. Specification of the BARE Message Encoding
A BARE message is a single value of a pre-defined type, which may be
of an aggregate type enclosing multiple values. Unless otherwise
specified, there is no additional container or structure around the
value; it is encoded plainly.
A BARE message does not necessarily have a fixed length, but the
schema author may make a deliberate choice to constrain themselves to
types of well-defined lengths if this is desired.
The names for each type are provided to establish a vocabulary for
describing a BARE message schema out-of-band, by parties who plan to
exchange BARE messages. The type names used here are provided for
this informative purpose, but are more rigourously specified by the
schema language specification in Section 3.
2.1. Primitive Types
Primitive types represent exactly one value.
uint
A variable-length unsigned integer encoded using the Unsigned
Little Endian Base 128 (ULEB128). Every octet of the encoded
value has the most-significant bit set, except for the last
octet. The remaining bits are the zero-extended integer
value in 7-bit groups, the least-significant group first.
The encoder MUST encode uint using the minimum necessary
number of octets, and the decoder SHOULD raise an error if it
encounters the opposite.
The maximum precision of such a number is 64-bits. The
maximum length of an encoded uint is therefore 10 octets.
Numbers that require all ten octets will have 6 bits in the
final octet that do not have meaning, between the least- and
most-significant bits. The implementation MUST set these to
zero.
int
A signed integer with variable-length encoding. Signed
integers are represented as uint using a "zig-zag" encoding:
positive values x are written as 2x + 0, negative values as
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
-2x - 1. Another way of looking at it is that negative
numbers are complemented, and whether to complement is
encoded in bit 0.
The encoder MUST encode int using the minimum necessary
number of octets, and the decoder SHOULD raise an error if it
encounters the opposite.
The maximum precision of such a number is 64-bits. The
maximum length of an encoded int is therefore 10 octets.
Numbers that require all ten octets will have 6 bits in the
final octet that do not have meaning, between the least- and
most-significant bits. The implementation MUST set these to
zero.
u8, u16, u32, u64
Unsigned integers of a fixed precision, respectively 8, 16,
32, and 64 bits. They are encoded in little-endian (least
significant octet first).
i8, i16, i32, i64
Signed integers of a fixed precision, respectively 8, 16, 32,
and 64 bits. They are encoded in little-endian (least
significant octet first), with two's complement notation.
f32, f64
Floating-point numbers represented with the IEEE 754
[IEEE.754.1985] binary32 and binary64 floating point number
formats.
bool
A boolean value, either true or false, encoded as a u8 type
with a value of one or zero, respectively representing true
or false.
If a value other than one or zero is found in the u8
representation of the bool, the message is considered
invalid, and the decoder SHOULD raise an error if it
encounters such a value.
str
A string of text. The length of the text in octets is
encoded first as a uint, followed by the text data
represented with the UTF-8 encoding [RFC3629].
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
If the data is found to contain invalid UTF-8 sequences, it
is considered invalid, and the decoder SHOULD raise an error
if it encounters such a value.
data
Arbitrary data of a variable length. The length (in octets)
is encoded first as a uint, followed by the data itself
encoded literally.
data[length]
Arbitrary data of a fixed "length", e.g. data[16]. The
length (in octets) is not encoded into the message. The data
is encoded literally in the message.
void
A type with zero length. It is not encoded into BARE
messages.
enum
An unsigned integer value from a set of named values agreed
upon in advance, encoded with the uint type.
An enum whose uint value is not a member of the values agreed
upon in advance is considered invalid, and the decoder SHOULD
raise an error if it encounters such a value.
Note that this makes the enum type unsuitable for
representing several enum values that have been combined with
a bitwise OR operation.
Using uint for enum value makes it possible to encode named
values with different number of octets. Constant-length enum
can be achieved when all the enum values are encoded by uints
with the same number of octets.
2.2. Aggregate Types
Aggregate types may store zero or more primitive or aggregate values.
optional<type>
A value of "type" that may or may not be present, e.g.
optional<u32>. Represented as either a u8 with a value of
zero, indicating that the optional value is unset; or a u8
with a value of one, followed by the encoded data of the
optional type.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
An optional value whose initial u8 is set to a number other
than zero or one is considered invalid, and the decoder
SHOULD raise an error if it encounters such a value.
list<type>
A variable-length list of "type" values, e.g. list<str>. The
length of the list (number of values) is encoded as a uint,
followed by the encoded values of each member of the list
concatenated.
list<type>[length]
A list of "length" values of "type", e.g. list<uint>[10].
The length is not encoded into the message. The encoded
values of each member of the list are concatenated to form
the encoded list.
map<type A><type B>
A mapping of "type B" values keyed by "type A" values, e.g.
map<u32><str>. The encoded representation of a map begins
with the number of key/value pairs encoded as a uint,
followed by the encoded key/value pairs concatenated. Each
key/value pair is encoded as the encoded key concatenated
with the encoded value.
A message with repeated keys is considered invalid, and the
decoder SHOULD raise an error if it encounters such a value.
union
A tagged union whose value may be one of any type from a set
of types agreed upon in advance. Every type in the set is
assigned a numeric identifier. The value is encoded as the
selected type's identifier represented with the uint
encoding, followed by the encoded value of that type.
A union with a tag value that does not have a corresponding
type assigned is considered invalid, and the decoder SHOULD
raise an error if it encounters such a value.
struct
A set of values of arbitrary types concatenated in an order
agreed upon in advance. Each value is called "field", and
the field has a name and type.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
2.3. User-Defined Types
A user-defined type gives a name to another type. This creates a
distinct type whose representation is equivalent to the named type.
An arbitrary number of user-defined types may be used for the same
underlying type; each is distinct from the other.
2.4. Invariants
The following invariants are specified:
* Any type that is ultimately a void type (either directly or via a
user-defined type) MUST NOT be used as an optional type, list
value, map key, map value, or struct field type. Void types may
only be used as members of the set of types in a tagged union.
* Enums MUST have at least one named value, and each named value of
an enum MUST be unique.
* The lengths of fixed-length data and fixed-length list types MUST
be at least one and MUST NOT be longer than
18,446,744,073,709,551,615 octets (the maximum value of a u64).
* Any map key type (directly or via a user-defined type) MUST be of
a primitive type that is not f32, f64, data, data[length], or
void.
* Unions MUST have at least one type, and each type of a union MUST
be unique.
* Structs MUST have at least one field, and each field of a struct
MUST have a unique name.
* Any user-defined type MUST be defined before used. Any user-
defined type MUST NOT be defined recursively (directly or
indirectly).
3. BARE Schema Language Specification
The use of the schema language is optional. Implementations SHOULD
support decoding arbitrary BARE messages without a schema document,
by defining the schema in a manner that utilizes more native tools
available from the programming environment.
However, it may be useful to have a schema document for use with code
generation, documentation, or interoperability. A domain-specific
language is provided for this purpose.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
3.1. Lexical Analysis
During lexical analysis, "#" is used for comments; if encountered,
the "#" character and any subsequent characters are discarded until a
line feed (%x0A) is found.
3.2. ABNF Grammar
The syntax of the schema language is provided here in Augmented
Backus-Naur Form [RFC5234]. However, this grammar differs from
[RFC5234] in that literal text strings are case-sensitive (e.g.
"type" does not match "TypE").
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
schema = [WS] user-types [WS]
user-types = user-type [WS user-types]
user-type = "type" WS user-type-name WS any-type
user-type-name = UPPER *(ALPHA / DIGIT) ; first letter is uppercase
any-type = "uint" / "u8" / "u16" / "u32" / "u64"
any-type =/ "int" / "i8" / "i16" / "i32" / "i64"
any-type =/ "f32" / "f64"
any-type =/ "bool"
any-type =/ "str"
any-type =/ "data" [length]
any-type =/ "void"
any-type =/ "enum" [WS] "{" [WS] enum-values [WS] "}"
any-type =/ "optional" type
any-type =/ "list" type [length]
any-type =/ "map" type type
any-type =/ "union" [WS] "{" [[WS] "|"] [WS] union-members [WS] ["|" [WS]] "}"
any-type =/ "struct" [WS] "{" [WS] struct-fields [WS] "}"
length = [WS] "[" [WS] integer [WS] "]"
integer = 1*DIGIT
enum-values = enum-value [WS enum-values]
enum-value = enum-value-name [[WS] "=" [WS] integer]
enum-value-name = UPPER *(UPPER / DIGIT / "_")
type = [WS] "<" [WS] any-type [WS] ">"
union-members = union-member [[WS] "|" [WS] union-members]
union-member = any-type [[WS] "=" [WS] integer]
struct-fields = struct-field [WS struct-fields]
struct-field = 1*ALPHA [WS] ":" [WS] any-type
UPPER = %x41-5A ; uppercase ASCII letters, i.e. A-Z
ALPHA = %x41-5A / %x61-7A ; A-Z / a-z
DIGIT = %x30-39 ; 0-9
WS = 1*(%x0A / %x09 / " ") ; whitespace
See Appendix B.1 for an example schema written in this language.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 10]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
3.3. Semantic Elements
The names of fields and user-defined types are informational: they
are not represented in BARE messages. They may be used by code
generation tools to inform the generation of field and type names in
the native programming environment.
Enum values are also informational. Values without an integer token
are assigned automatically in the order that they appear, starting
from zero and incrementing by one for each subsequent unassigned
value. If a value is explicitly specified, automatic assignment
continues from that value plus one for subsequent enum values.
Union type members are assigned a tag in the order that they appear,
starting from zero and incrementing by one for each subsequent type.
If a tag value is explicitly specified, automatic assignment
continues from that value plus one for subsequent values.
4. Application Considerations
Message authors who wish to design a schema that is backwards- and
forwards-compatible with future messages are encouraged to use union
types for this purpose. New types may be appended to the members of
a union type while retaining backwards compatibility with older
message types. The choice to do this must be made from the first
message version -- moving a struct into a union _does not_ produce a
backwards-compatible message.
The following schema provides an example:
type Message union {MessageV1 | MessageV2 | MessageV3}
type MessageV1 ...
type MessageV2 ...
type MessageV3 ...
An updated schema that adds a MessageV4 type would still be able to
decode versions 1, 2, and 3.
If a message version is later deprecated, it may be removed in a
manner compatible with future versions 2 and 3 if the initial tag is
specified explicitly.
type Message union {MessageV2 = 1 | MessageV3}
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 11]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
5. Future Considerations
To ensure message compatibility between implementations and
backwards- and forwards-compatibility of messages, constraints on
vendor extensions are required. This specification is final, and new
types or extensions will not be added in the future. Implementors
MUST NOT define extensions to this specification.
To support the encoding of novel data structures, the implementor
SHOULD make use of user-defined types in combination with the data or
data[length] types.
6. IANA Considerations
This memo includes no request to IANA.
7. Security Considerations
Message decoders are common vectors for security vulnerabilities.
BARE addresses this by making the message format as simple as
possible. However, the decoder MUST be prepared to handle a number
of error cases when decoding untrusted messages, such as a union type
with an invalid tag, or an enum with an invalid value. Such errors
may also arise by mistake, for example when attempting to decode a
message with the wrong schema.
Support for data types of an arbitrary, message-defined length
(lists, maps, strings, etc) is commonly exploited to cause the
implementation to exhaust its resources while decoding a message.
However, legitimate use-cases for extremely large data types
(possibly larger than the system has the resources to store all at
once) do exist. The decoder MUST manage its resources accordingly,
and SHOULD provide the application a means of providing their own
decoder implementation for values that are expected to be large.
There is only one valid interpretation of a BARE message for a given
schema, and different decoders and encoders should be expected to
provide that interpretation. If an implementation has limitations
imposed from the programming environment (such as limits on numeric
precision), the implementor MUST document these limitations, and
prevent conflicting interpretations from causing undesired behavior.
8. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 12]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC5234] Crocker, D., Ed. and P. Overell, "Augmented BNF for Syntax
Specifications: ABNF", STD 68, RFC 5234,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5234, January 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5234>.
[RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO
10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, DOI 10.17487/RFC3629, November
2003, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3629>.
[IEEE.754.1985]
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,
"Standard for Binary Floating-Point Arithmetic",
IEEE Standard 754, August 1985.
Appendix A. Example Values
This section lists example values in decimal, as string, or as named
value (left or top), and their encoded representation in hexadecimal
(right or bottom).
uint
0 00
1 01
126 7e
127 7f
128 80 01
129 81 01
255 FF 01
int
0 00
1 02
-1 01
63 7e
-63 7d
64 80 01
-64 7f
65 82 01
-65 81 01
255 FE 03
-255 FD 03
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 13]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
u32
0 00 00 00 00
1 01 00 00 00
255 FF 00 00 00
i16
0 00 00
1 01 00
-1 FF FF
255 FF 00
-255 01 FF
f64
0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
1.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 f0 3f
2.55 66 66 66 66 66 66 04 40
-25.5 00 00 00 00 00 80 39 C0
bool
true 01
false 00
str
"BARE" 04 42 41 52 45
data
Example value is in hexadecimal.
aa ee ff ee dd cc bb aa ee dd cc bb ee dd cc bb
10 aa ee ff ee dd cc bb aa ee dd cc bb ee dd cc
bb
data[16]
Example value is in hexadecimal.
aa ee ff ee dd cc bb aa ee dd cc bb ee dd cc bb
aa ee ff ee dd cc bb aa ee dd cc bb ee dd cc bb
void
Not encoded.
enum {FOO BAR = 255 BUZZ}
FOO 00
BAR FF 01
BUZZ 80 02
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 14]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
optional<u32>
(unset) 00
0 01 00 00 00 00
1 01 01 00 00 00
255 01 FF 00 00 00
list<str>
"foo" "bar" "buzz"
03 03 66 6f 6f 03 62 61 72 04 62 75 7A 7A
list<uint>[10]
0 1 254 255 256 257 126 127 128 129
00 01 FE 01 FF 01 80 02 81 02 7E 7F 80 01 81 01
map<u32><str>
0 => "zero"
1 => "one"
255 => "two hundreds and fifty five"
03 00 00 00 00 04 7A 65 72 6F 01 00 00 00 03 6F
6E 65 FF 00 00 00 1B 74 77 6F 20 68 75 6E 64 72
65 64 73 20 61 6E 64 20 66 69 66 74 79 20 66 69
76 65
union {int | uint = 255 | str}
0 00 00
1 00 02
1 FF 01 01
-1 00 01
255 00 FE 03
255 FF 01 FF 01
-255 00 FD 03
"BARE" 80 02 04 42 41 52 45
struct {foo: uint bar: int buzz: str}
foo => 255
bar => -255
buzz => "BARE"
FF 01 FD 03 04 42 41 52 45
Appendix B. Example Company
An example company that uses BARE to encode data about customers and
employees.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 15]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
B.1. Message Schema
The following is an example of a schema written in the BARE schema
language.
type PublicKey data[128]
type Time str # ISO 8601
type Department enum {
ACCOUNTING
ADMINISTRATION
CUSTOMER_SERVICE
DEVELOPMENT
# Reserved for the CEO
JSMITH = 99
}
type Address list<str>[4] # street, city, state, country
type Customer struct {
name: str
email: str
address: Address
orders: list<struct {
orderId: i64
quantity: i32
}>
metadata: map<str><data>
}
type Employee struct {
name: str
email: str
address: Address
department: Department
hireDate: Time
publicKey: optional<PublicKey>
metadata: map<str><data>
}
type TerminatedEmployee void
type Person union {Customer | Employee | TerminatedEmployee}
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 16]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
B.2. Encoded Messages
Some basic example messages in hexadecimal are provided for the
schema specified in Appendix B.1.
A "Person" value of type "Customer" with the following values:
name James Smith
email jsmith@example.org
address 123 Main St; Philadelphia; PA; United States
orders (1) orderId: 4242424242; quantity: 5
metadata (unset)
Encoded BARE message:
00 0b 4a 61 6d 65 73 20 53 6d 69 74 68 12 6a 73
6d 69 74 68 40 65 78 61 6d 70 6c 65 2e 6f 72 67
0b 31 32 33 20 4d 61 69 6e 20 53 74 0c 50 68 69
6c 61 64 65 6c 70 68 69 61 02 50 41 0d 55 6e 69
74 65 64 20 53 74 61 74 65 73 01 b2 41 de fc 00
00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00
Encoded BARE message, but characters of strings are decoded:
00 0b J a m e s S m i t h 12 j s
m i t h @ e x a m p l e . o r g
0b 1 2 3 M a i n S t 0c P h i
l a d e l p h i a 02 P A 0d U n i
t e d S t a t e s 01 b2 41 de fc 00
00 00 00 05 00 00 00 00
A "Person" value of type "Employee" with the following values:
name Tiffany Doe
email tiffanyd@acme.corp
address 123 Main St; Philadelphia; PA; United States
department ADMINISTRATION
hireDate 2020-06-21T21:18:05Z
publicKey (unset)
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 17]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
metadata (unset)
Encoded BARE message:
01 0b 54 69 66 66 61 6e 79 20 44 6f 65 12 74 69
66 66 61 6e 79 64 40 61 63 6d 65 2e 63 6f 72 70
0b 31 32 33 20 4d 61 69 6e 20 53 74 0c 50 68 69
6c 61 64 65 6c 70 68 69 61 02 50 41 0d 55 6e 69
74 65 64 20 53 74 61 74 65 73 01 14 32 30 32 30
2d 30 36 2d 32 31 54 32 31 3a 31 38 3a 30 35 5a
00 00
Encoded BARE message, but characters of strings are decoded:
01 0b T i f f a n y D o e 12 t i
f f a n y d @ a c m e . c o r p
0b 1 2 3 M a i n S t 0c P h i
l a d e l p h i a 02 P A 0d U n i
t e d S t a t e s 01 14 2 0 2 0
- 0 6 - 2 1 T 2 1 : 1 8 : 0 5 Z
00 00
A "Person" value of type "TerminatedEmployee".
Encoded BARE message:
02
Appendix C. Complex Data
BARE schema examples for complex data structures.
C.1. Simple Hierarchical Data
Recursive data types are forbidden in BARE. The following examples
show how linked list and binary tree, widely used recursive data
types, can be encoded in BARE messages.
As BARE supports variable-length lists, encoding of linked list is
straightforward.
type Element struct {
str: what
}
type LinkedList list<Element>
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 18]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
A binary tree can be encoded to BARE's variable-length list with 2x +
1 and 2x + 2 indexing.
type Node optional<struct {
str: what
}>
type BinaryTree list<Node>
C.2. JSON Schema
Sometimes it is needed to deal with generic format of data. When the
use-case for recursive types is encountered, each element to encode
needs to be identified.
type ElementId uint
type False void
type True void
type Null void
type Object map<str><ElementId>
type Array list<ElementId>
type Element union {
| False
| True
| Null
| f64
| str
| Object
| Array
}
type JSONDocument list<Element>
C.3. Graph
It is not possible to encode pointers in BARE. However, an arbitrary
graph can be encoded in the lists of nodes and connections.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 19]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
type NodeId uint
type Node struct {
what: str
}
type Connection struct {
from: NodeId
to: NodeId
why: str
}
type Graph struct {
nodes: map<NodeId><Node>
edges: list<Connection>
}
Appendix D. Design Decisions
This section documents the reasoning behind the decisions made during
BARE specification process.
*f32 and f64 are fully compliant with IEEE 754 [IEEE.754.1985]*
The use-case is a sensor sending NaN values or encoding of
infinity in scientific applications.
The consequences are that encoded values of f32 and f64 types are
not canonical, and therefore forbidden as map keys.
*Types of a union needs to be unique*
However, user-defined types are distinct types, so it is not a
problem overall.
*Recursive types are forbidden*
Recursive types bring the possibility to encode arbitrary tree
data structures for the price of:
1. runtime errors for cyclic references,
2. possible stack overflows during encoding/decoding when
recursive encoders/decoders are used,
3. confusion because they do not come with pointers, although
data to encode usually uses pointers.
It is not worth it.
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 20]
Internet-Draft BARE May 2022
The consequence is that recursive types need to be mapped to non-
recursive types when used.
*Namespaces or imports are not used*
It would increase complexity. BARE schema language is simple.
*There is no bitmap type*
Use data[length] instead.
*There is no date/time type*
Use u64 for timestamp or str.
*There is no ordered map type*
Ordered maps are not widely supported in programming environments.
Users that want to use ordered maps can use a list of pairs:
list<struct {
key: KeyType
val: ValType
}>
Author's Address
Drew DeVault
SourceHut
454 E. Girard Ave #2R
Philadelphia, PA 19125
United States of America
Phone: +1 719 213 5473
Email: sir@cmpwn.com
URI: https://sourcehut.org/
DeVault Expires 12 November 2022 [Page 21]