Skip to main content

Marking behaviour of PCN-nodes

Document Type Replaced Internet-Draft (individual)
Expired & archived
Author Philip Eardley
Last updated 2008-06-26
Replaced by RFC 5670
RFC stream (None)
Intended RFC status (None)
Stream Stream state (No stream defined)
Consensus boilerplate Unknown
RFC Editor Note (None)
IESG IESG state Replaced by draft-ietf-pcn-marking-behaviour
Telechat date (None)
Responsible AD (None)
Send notices to (None)

This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:


This document standardises the two marking behaviours of PCN-nodes: threshold marking and excess traffic marking. Threshold marking marks all PCN-packets if the PCN traffic rate is greater than a first configured rate. Excess traffic marking marks a proportion of PCN- packets, such that the amount marked equals the traffic rate in excess of a second configured rate.Requirements Language The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].


Philip Eardley

(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)