PROBE: A Utility for Probing Interfaces
draft-fenner-int-probe-clarification-01
| Document | Type |
Replaced Internet-Draft
(individual)
Expired & archived
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Bill Fenner (ˢˣˠ) , Ron Bonica , Reji Thomas , Jen Linkova , Chris Lenart , Mohamed Boucadair | ||
| Last updated | 2024-01-26 | ||
| Replaced by | draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification | ||
| RFC stream | (None) | ||
| Intended RFC status | (None) | ||
| Formats | |||
| Stream | Stream state | (No stream defined) | |
| Consensus boilerplate | Unknown | ||
| RFC Editor Note | (None) | ||
| IESG | IESG state | Replaced by draft-fenner-intarea-probe-clarification | |
| Telechat date | (None) | ||
| Responsible AD | (None) | ||
| Send notices to | (None) |
This Internet-Draft is no longer active. A copy of the expired Internet-Draft is available in these formats:
Abstract
This document describes a network diagnostic tool called PROBE. PROBE is similar to PING in that it can be used to query the status of a probed interface, but it differs from PING in that it does not require bidirectional connectivity between the probing and probed interfaces. Instead, PROBE requires bidirectional connectivity between the probing interface and a proxy interface. The proxy interface can reside on the same node as the probed interface, or it can reside on a node to which the probed interface is directly connected. This document updates RFC 4884 and obsoletes RFC 8335.
Authors
Bill Fenner (ˢˣˠ)
Ron Bonica
Reji Thomas
Jen Linkova
Chris Lenart
Mohamed Boucadair
(Note: The e-mail addresses provided for the authors of this Internet-Draft may no longer be valid.)